Literature DB >> 23001961

Genetic analysis of sexual dimorphism of body weight in broilers.

G Maniatis1, N Demiris, A Kranis, G Banos, A Kominakis.   

Abstract

Variation in sexual dimorphism (SD) is particularly marked in meat-type chickens. This paper investigates the genetic basis of SD in an important economic trait, i.e. body weight (BW) at 35 days of age, in broilers by applying quantitative genetic analysis. A large dataset comprising 203,323 BW records of a commercial line of broiler chicken was used. First, a bivariate approach was employed treating BW as a sex-specific trait. During this approach, seven bivariate models were applied and variances due to direct additive genetic, maternal genetic and maternal environmental effects were estimated via the restricted maximum likelihood method. The best-fitting model included direct additive genetic, maternal genetic and maternal environmental effects with a direct-maternal genetic covariance. Differences between male and female direct heritabilities were non-significant (0.28 vs. 0.29 for males and females, respectively), implying no need for sex-specific selection strategies. The direct-maternal genetic correlation was more strongly negative in males than in females (-0.72 vs. -0.56), implying a more profound antagonism between direct additive and maternal genetic effects in this particular gender. The direct genetic correlation of BW between the two sexes was as high as 0.91, i.e. only slightly lower than unity. Second, variance components and genetic parameters of two measures of SD, i.e. the weight difference (Δ) and the weight ratio (R), between the genders were estimated. Direct heritabilities for both measures were significantly different to 0 but of low magnitude (0.04). Apart from the additive-maternal covariance, no other random effects were found to be of importance for Δ and R. The results of the present study suggest that only minimal selection responses due to the selection of Δ and/or R and a small capacity for amplifying or reducing the BW differences between the sexes are to be expected in this specific population. Furthermore, selection pressure on BW is expected to amplify SD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001961     DOI: 10.1007/s13353-012-0116-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Genet        ISSN: 1234-1983            Impact factor:   3.240


  10 in total

1.  The impact of data structure on genetic (co)variance components of early growth in sheep, estimated using an animal model with maternal effects.

Authors:  N Maniatis; G E Pollott
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Ontogeny of additive and maternal genetic effects: lessons from domestic mammals.

Authors:  Alastair J Wilson; Denis Reale
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Relationship between sire x year interactions and direct-maternal genetic correlation for weaning weight of Simmental cattle.

Authors:  C Lee; E J Pollak
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  THE EVOLUTION OF MATERNAL CHARACTERS.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Sexual dimorphism and direct and maternal genetic effects on body weight in mice.

Authors:  J P Hanrahan; E J Eisen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 6.  The role of maternal effects in animal breeding. 3. Biometrical aspects of maternal effects in animals.

Authors:  R L Willham
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  The correlation between feed efficiency and rate of gain, a ratio and its denominator.

Authors:  T M Sutherland
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Domestic chickens defy Rensch's rule: sexual size dimorphism in chicken breeds.

Authors:  V Remeš; T Székely
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Animal model analysis of genetic (co)variances for growth traits in Japanese quail.

Authors:  S E Aggrey; K M Cheng
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Genotype-sex interaction and the genetic correlation between the sexes for body weight in Mus musculus.

Authors:  E J Eisen; J E Legates
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 4.562

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Accuracy of estimated breeding values with genomic information on males, females, or both: an example on broiler chicken.

Authors:  Daniela A L Lourenco; Breno O Fragomeni; Shogo Tsuruta; Ignacio Aguilar; Birgit Zumbach; Rachel J Hawken; Andres Legarra; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.297

2.  Sex differences in basal hypothalamic anorectic and orexigenic gene expression and the effect of quantitative and qualitative food restriction.

Authors:  S D Caughey; P W Wilson; N Mukhtar; S Brocklehurst; A Reid; R B D'Eath; T Boswell; I C Dunn
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 5.027

3.  No evidence that selection for egg production persistency causes loss of bone quality in laying hens.

Authors:  Ian C Dunn; Dirk-Jan De Koning; Heather A McCormack; Robert H Fleming; Peter W Wilson; Björn Andersson; Matthias Schmutz; Cristina Benavides; Nazaret Dominguez-Gasca; Estefania Sanchez-Rodriguez; Alejandro B Rodriguez-Navarro
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.297

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.