Literature DB >> 23001623

Biogeographic variation in behavioral and morphological responses to predation risk.

Scott I Large1, Delbert L Smee.   

Abstract

The expression of prey antipredator defenses is often related to ambient consumer pressure, and prey express greater defenses under intense consumer pressure. Predation is generally greater at lower latitudes, and antipredator defenses often display a biogeographic pattern. Predation pressure may also vary significantly between habitats within latitudes, making biogeographic patterns difficult to distinguish. Furthermore, invasive predators may also influence the expression of prey defenses in ecological time. The purpose of this study was to determine how these factors influence the strength of antipredator responses. To assess patterns in prey antipredator defenses based upon geographic range (north vs. south), habitat type (wave-protected vs. wave-exposed shores), and invasive predators, we examined how native rock (Cancer irroratus) and invasive green (Carcinus maenas) crab predators influence the behavioral and morphological defenses of dogwhelk (Nucella lapillus) prey from habitats that differ in wave exposure across an ~230 km range within the Gulf of Maine. The expression of behavioral and morphological antipredatory responses varied according to wave exposure, geographic location, and predator species. Dogwhelks from areas with an established history with green crabs exhibited the largest behavioral and morphological antipredator responses to green crabs. Dogwhelk behavioral responses to rock crabs did not vary between habitats or geographic regions, although morphological responses were greater further south where predation pressure was greatest. These findings suggest that dogwhelk responses to invasive and native predators vary according to geographic location and habitat, and are strongly affected by ambient predation pressure due to the invasion history of an exotic predator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001623     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2450-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Induced defenses in response to an invading crab predator: an explanation of historical and geographic phenotypic change.

Authors:  G C Trussell; L D Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Predator hunting mode and habitat domain alter nonconsumptive effects in predator-prey interactions.

Authors:  Evan L Preisser; John L Orrock; Oswald J Schmitz
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Prioritized phenotypic responses to combined predators in a marine snail.

Authors:  Paul E Bourdeau
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  An inducible morphological defence is a passive by-product of behaviour in a marine snail.

Authors:  Paul E Bourdeau
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Components of predation intensity in the low zone of the New England rocky intertidal region.

Authors:  Bruce A Menge
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  PREDATION PRESSURE AND GASTROPOD FORAGING: A TROPICAL-TEMPERATE COMPARISON.

Authors:  Mark D Bertness; Stephen D Garrity; Sally C Levings
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait- and density-mediated indirect interactions.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Trussell; Patrick J Ewanchuk; Catherine M Matassa
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Divergent induced responses to an invasive predator in marine mussel populations.

Authors:  Aaren S Freeman; James E Byers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Water-borne stimuli released by predatory crabs and damaged prey induce more predator-resistant shells in a marine gastropod.

Authors:  R D Appleton; A R Palmer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Clamming up: environmental forces diminish the perceptive ability of bivalve prey.

Authors:  Delbert L Smee; Marc J Weissburg
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.499

View more
  5 in total

1.  Inducible defenses in Olympia oysters in response to an invasive predator.

Authors:  Jillian M Bible; Kaylee R Griffith; Eric Sanford
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Global determinants of prey naiveté to exotic predators.

Authors:  Andrea Anton; Nathan R Geraldi; Anthony Ricciardi; Jaimie T A Dick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Global ecological impacts of marine exotic species.

Authors:  Andrea Anton; Nathan R Geraldi; Catherine E Lovelock; Eugenia T Apostolaki; Scott Bennett; Just Cebrian; Dorte Krause-Jensen; Nuria Marbà; Paulina Martinetto; John M Pandolfi; Julia Santana-Garcon; Carlos M Duarte
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Phylogeography and larval spine length of the dragonfly Leucorhinia dubia in Europe.

Authors:  Frank Johansson; Peter Halvarsson; Dirk J Mikolajewski; Jacob Höglund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Periwinkle climbing response to water- and airbone predator chemical cues may depend on home-marsh geography.

Authors:  John M Carroll; Morgan B Church; Christopher M Finelli
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.