Literature DB >> 23001605

Immediate effects of the initial FDA notification on the use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse surgery in medicare beneficiaries.

W Stuart Reynolds1, Karen P Gold, Shenghua Ni, Melissa R Kaufman, Roger R Dmochowski, David F Penson.   

Abstract

AIMS: Prompted by increased reports of complications with the use of mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery, the FDA issued an initial public health notification (PHN) in 2008. We proposed to determine if the numbers of POP cases augmented with surgical mesh performed in U.S. Medicare beneficiaries changed relative to this PHN.
METHODS: Using administrative healthcare claims for beneficiaries enrolled in the U.S. Medicare program from 2008 to 2009, we identified women who underwent POP surgery with and without surgical mesh by procedural and diagnosis coding. In addition to comparing cases with and without mesh, we also calculated rates (number of cases per 100,000 female beneficiaries) and compared these relative to the timing of the PHN.
RESULTS: We identified 104,185 POP procedures, of which 27,839 (26.7%) included mesh material and 76,346 (73.3%) did not. Between the last three quarters of 2008 and the first three of 2009, the rates of mesh cases increased (40.3-42.1, P < 0.001) and those without mesh decreased (115.5-111.4, P < 0.001). Inpatient procedures decreased and outpatient procedures increased for both those with and without mesh augmentation. For inpatient procedures, the relative use of biologic graft and synthetic mesh material did not vary over the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of Medicare beneficiaries underwent mesh POP procedures in 2008-2009. However, despite the PHN cautioning about potential mesh complications, the numbers of mesh cases continued to rise in the immediate period after the PHN.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001605      PMCID: PMC3962985          DOI: 10.1002/nau.22318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn        ISSN: 0733-2467            Impact factor:   2.696


  14 in total

1.  An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen; Robert M Freeman; Steven E Swift; Michel Cosson; G Willy Davila; Jan Deprest; Peter L Dwyer; Brigitte Fatton; Ervin Kocjancic; Joseph Lee; Chris Maher; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Peter K Sand; Gabriel N Schaer; Ralph Webb
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 2.  Efficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery for anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  X Jia; C Glazener; G Mowatt; G MacLennan; C Bain; C Fraser; J Burr
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 6.531

3.  Words of wisdom. Re: FDA public health notification: serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Firouz Daneshgari
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  The UK national prolapse survey: 5 years on.

Authors:  Swati Jha; Paul Moran
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.

Authors:  Christopher Maher; Benjamin Feiner; Kaven Baessler; Elisabeth J Adams; Suzanne Hagen; Cathryn Ma Glazener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

6.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Use of synthetic mesh in pelvic reconstructive surgery: a survey of attitudes and practice patterns of urogynecologists.

Authors:  Samantha J Pulliam; Tanaz R Ferzandi; Lekha S Hota; Eman A Elkadry; Peter L Rosenblatt
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-04-25

Review 8.  Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Ingrid E Nygaard; Rebecca McCreery; Linda Brubaker; AnnaMarie Connolly; Geoff Cundiff; Anne M Weber; Halina Zyczynski
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Two-year outcomes after sacrocolpopexy with and without burch to prevent stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Linda Brubaker; Ingrid Nygaard; Holly E Richter; Anthony Visco; Anne M Weber; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Paul Fine; Chiara Ghetti; Morton B Brown
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  The age distribution, rates, and types of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the USA.

Authors:  Aparna D Shah; Neeraj Kohli; Sujatha S Rajan; Lennox Hoyte
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-09-20
View more
  10 in total

1.  Short-term outcomes of vaginal mesh placement among female Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Jennifer T Anger; Aqsa A Khan; Karyn S Eilber; Erin Chong; Stephanie Histed; Ning Wu; Chris L Pashos; J Quentin Clemens
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Pelvic organ prolapse surgical management in Portugal and FDA safety communication have an impact on vaginal mesh.

Authors:  Teresa Mascarenhas; Miguel Mascarenhas-Saraiva; Amélia Ricon-Ferraz; Paula Nogueira; Fernando Lopes; Alberto Freitas
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Transvaginal mesh: a historical review and update of the current state of affairs in the United States.

Authors:  Shilpa Iyer; Sylvia M Botros
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  The Role of the Surgeon on Outcomes of Vaginal Prolapse Surgery With Mesh.

Authors:  Karyn S Eilber; Marianna Alperin; Aqsa Khan; Ning Wu; Chris L Pashos; J Quentin Clemens; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

5.  Trends in management of pelvic organ prolapse among female Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Aqsa A Khan; Karyn S Eilber; J Quentin Clemens; Ning Wu; Chris L Pashos; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Attitudes toward transvaginal mesh among patients in a urogynecology practice.

Authors:  Sybil G Dessie; Michele R Hacker; Miriam J Haviland; Peter L Rosenblatt
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Postoperative pain outcomes after transvaginal mesh revision.

Authors:  Jill M Danford; David J Osborn; W Stuart Reynolds; Daniel H Biller; Roger R Dmochowski
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Use and risks of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women in New York state: population based cohort study.

Authors:  Bilal Chughtai; Jialin Mao; Jessica Buck; Steven Kaplan; Art Sedrakyan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-06-02

Review 9.  Vaginal Approaches Using Synthetic Mesh to Treat Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

Authors:  Jei Won Moon; Hee Dong Chae
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2016-02-29

10.  Synthetic slings in the treatment of urinary incontinence: lessons learned and future perspectives.

Authors:  Cássio L Z Riccetto
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.541

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.