Literature DB >> 23001512

The strongest resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to erythromycin is caused by decreasing uptake of the antibiotic into the cells.

Elżbieta Piątkowska1, Jerzy Piątkowski, Anna Przondo-Mordarska.   

Abstract

The consequence of excessive use of macrolides is a high occurrence of mechanisms responsible for resistance to these drugs. Of 97 erythromycin-resistant bacterial strains gathered in the Wrocław area in Poland, 60% exhibited very high resistance, and those with the inducible MLS(B) (macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B) resistance phenotype predominated. Direct genetic investigation revealed that the erm genes coding for ribosomal methylases are the most frequently occurring erythromycin resistance-determining genes. No genetic resistance determinant was detected in 13% of the erythromycin-resistant strains. The efflux mechanism occurs in strains isolated from the nasopharyngeal cavity twice as often as in those isolated from other material, where the mechanism connected with target site modification predominates. Measurements of radiolabelled antibiotic accumulation inside bacterial cells revealed that in highly resistant strains (MIC > 1024 μg/ml), an important factor responsible for the resistance is the permeability barrier at the cell wall level. This would be a hitherto unknown mechanism of resistance to erythromycin in Staphylococcus aureus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001512      PMCID: PMC6275907          DOI: 10.2478/s11658-012-0034-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett        ISSN: 1425-8153            Impact factor:   5.787


  21 in total

1.  Clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus with ribosomal mutations conferring resistance to macrolides.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Prunier; Brigitte Malbruny; Didier Tandé; Bertrand Picard; Roland Leclercq
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Mobile genes coding for efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Patrick Butaye; Axel Cloeckaert; Stefan Schwarz
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 3.  Genetics of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Slade O Jensen; Bruce R Lyon
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.165

4.  Characteristic expression of three genes, msr(A), mph(C) and erm(Y), that confer resistance to macrolide antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Mayumi Matsuoka; Matsuhisa Inoue; Yoshihiro Endo; Yoshinori Nakajima
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Mechanisms of bacterial resistance to macrolide antibiotics.

Authors:  Yoshinori Nakajima
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.211

6.  Effects of an efflux mechanism and ribosomal mutations on macrolide susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae clinical isolates.

Authors:  Mihaela Peric; Bülent Bozdogan; Michael R Jacobs; Peter C Appelbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Clinical strain of Staphylococcus aureus inactivates and causes efflux of macrolides.

Authors:  L Wondrack; M Massa; B V Yang; J Sutcliffe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Msr(A) and related macrolide/streptogramin resistance determinants: incomplete transporters?

Authors:  Elinor Reynolds; Jeremy I Ross; Jonathan H Cove
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 9.  Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and its contributing factors.

Authors:  Karthikeyan Sivaraman; Nitya Venkataraman; Alexander M Cole
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.165

Review 10.  The selection of aptamers specific for membrane molecular targets.

Authors:  Teresa Janas; Tadeusz Janas
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 5.787

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Resistance to Macrolide Antibiotics in Public Health Pathogens.

Authors:  Corey Fyfe; Trudy H Grossman; Kathy Kerstein; Joyce Sutcliffe
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  Sugar-Grafted Cyclodextrin Nanocarrier as a "Trojan Horse" for Potentiating Antibiotic Activity.

Authors:  Min Li; Koon Gee Neoh; Liqun Xu; Liang Yuan; David Tai Leong; En-Tang Kang; Kim Lee Chua; Li Yang Hsu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  ErmF and ereD are responsible for erythromycin resistance in Riemerella anatipestifer.

Authors:  Linlin Xing; Hui Yu; Jingjing Qi; Pan Jiang; Bingqing Sun; Junsheng Cui; Changcan Ou; Weishan Chang; Qinghai Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Development and Research Progress of Anti-Drug Resistant Bacteria Drugs.

Authors:  Xiangyi Cui; Yuhong Lü; Changwu Yue
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.003

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.