Literature DB >> 23001188

Effects of early bilateral mandibular first molar extraction on condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry.

Koray Halicioglu1, Mevlut Celikoglu, Murat Caglaroglu, Suleyman Kutalmis Buyuk, Ismail Akkas, Ahmet Ercan Sekerci.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate the mandibular vertical asymmetry in a group of adult patients who had early bilateral mandibular first molar extractions.
METHODS: Mandibular asymmetry index measurements (condylar, ramal, and condylar plus ramal) were made on the panoramic radiographs of a study group including 30 subjects (mean age, 18.22 ± 1.30 years) and a control group of 25 subjects (mean age, 18.24 ± 1.17 years). Group I comprised the control group patients with no extractions and had excellent class I relationships, no missing teeth, and slight or moderate anterior crowding. Group II included patients with a bilateral mandibular first molar teeth extracted before the age of 12 years. Student's t test was used for the comparison of asymmetry index values between the groups. A paired t test was used to determine possible statistically significant differences between the sides for condylar, ramal, and condylar plus ramal height measurements.
RESULTS: No group showed statistically significant side-specific differences for posterior vertical height measurements. Condylar asymmetry index (CAI), ramal asymmetry index, and condylar plus ramal asymmetry index measurements were not statistically different between the groups (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: CAI values were significantly high when compared with the 3 % threshold value in the both groups, but comparisons between the groups were not statistically significant. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This article investigates the effects of early bilateral mandibular molar teeth extraction that has never been investigated in the literature. The present study showed that the lengths of the condylar, ramal, and condylar plus ramal height were less in the study group than in a well-matched control group of without extraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001188     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-012-0843-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  30 in total

1.  Prevalence of mandibular asymmetries in growing patients.

Authors:  German O Ramirez-Yañez; Allyson Stewart; Erin Franken; Kenia Campos
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Mandibular asymmetry diagnosis with panoramic imaging.

Authors:  Dana C Van Elslande; Shawn J Russett; Paul W Major; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  The condylar asymmetry measurements in different skeletal patterns.

Authors:  A M Sahin Sağlam
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.837

4.  A posteroanterior cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry.

Authors:  G M Letzer; J H Kronman
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1967-07       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  A preliminary anatomical study on the association of condylar and occlusal asymmetry.

Authors:  Mei-Qing Wang; Jian-Jun He; Chang-Sheng Chen; Sven E Widmalm
Journal:  Cranio       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.020

6.  Condylar asymmetry and age in patients with an Angle's Class II division 2 malocclusion.

Authors:  V J Miller; A Smidt
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.837

7.  Asymmetric extractions used in the treatment of patients with asymmetries.

Authors:  J Rebellato
Journal:  Semin Orthod       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 0.970

8.  Mandibular asymmetry in cleft lip and palate patients.

Authors:  Gokmen Kurt; Mehmet Bayram; Tancan Uysal; Mete Ozer
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Mandibular asymmetry in different occlusion patterns.

Authors:  Omer Said Sezgin; Peruze Celenk; Selim Arici
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Evaluation of asymmetries between subjects with Class II subdivision and apparent facial asymmetry and those with normal occlusion.

Authors:  Angela Rita Pontes Azevedo; Guilherme Janson; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Marcos Roberto de Freitas
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  4 in total

1.  Permanent first molar extraction in adolescents and young adults and its effect on the development of third molar.

Authors:  Koray Halicioglu; Orcun Toptas; Ismail Akkas; Mevlut Celikoglu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Prevalence of Missing First Permanent Molars in a Selected Population in a University Dental Clinic Setting: A Retrospective Radiographic Study.

Authors:  Yousef M Almugla
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr

3.  Effects of early unilateral mandibular first molar extraction on condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry.

Authors:  Koray Halicioglu; Mevlut Celikoglu; Suleyman K Buyuk; Ahmet E Sekerci; Celal Candirli
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-04

4.  Is there an association between skeletal asymmetry and tooth absence?

Authors:  Guilherme Thiesen; Bruno Frazão Gribel; Keila Cristina Rausch Pereira; Maria Perpetua Mota Freitas
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.