Literature DB >> 23001053

Intraoperative neuromuscular monitoring site and residual paralysis.

Stephan R Thilen1, Bradley E Hansen, Ramesh Ramaiah, Christopher D Kent, Miriam M Treggiari, Sanjay M Bhananker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Residual paralysis is common after general anesthesia involving administration of neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs). Management of NMBDs and reversal is frequently guided by train-of-four (TOF) monitoring. We hypothesized that monitoring of eye muscles is associated with more frequent residual paralysis than monitoring at the adductor pollicis.
METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled 180 patients scheduled for elective surgery with anticipated use of NMBDs. Collected variables included monitoring site, age, gender, weight, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class, type and duration of surgery, type of NMBDs, last and total dose administered, TOF count at time of reversal, dose of neostigmine, and time interval between last dose of NMBDs to quantitative measurement. Upon postanesthesia care unit admission, we measured TOF ratios by acceleromyography at the adductor pollicis. Residual paralysis was defined as a TOF ratio less than 90%. Multivariable logistic regression was used to account for unbalances between the two groups and to adjust for covariates.
RESULTS: 150 patients received NMBDs and were included in the analysis. Patients with intraoperative TOF monitoring of eye muscles had significantly greater incidence of residual paralysis than patients monitored at the adductor pollicis (P < 0.01). Residual paralysis was observed in 51/99 (52%) and 11/51 (22%) of patients, respectively. The crude odds ratio was 3.9 (95% CI: 1.8-8.4), and the adjusted odds ratio was 5.5 (95% CI: 2.1-14.5).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients having qualitative TOF monitoring of eye muscles had a greater than 5-fold higher risk of postoperative residual paralysis than those monitored at the adductor pollicis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001053     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31826f8fdd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  6 in total

Review 1.  Neuromuscular monitoring: an update.

Authors:  Mădălina Duţu; Robert Ivaşcu; Oana Tudorache; Darius Morlova; Alina Stanca; Silvius Negoiţă; Dan Corneci
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2018-04

Review 2.  [Algorithm-based preventive strategies for avoidance of residual neuromuscular blocks].

Authors:  C Unterbuchner; K Ehehalt; B Graf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Usefulness of intra-operative neuromuscular blockade monitoring and reversal agents for postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Gonzalo Domenech; Matías A Kampel; María E García Guzzo; Delfina Sánchez Novas; Sergio A Terrasa; Gustavo Garcia Fornari
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Comparison between the trapezius and adductor pollicis muscles as an acceleromyography monitoring site for moderate neuromuscular blockade during lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Seok Kyeong Oh; Sangwoo Park; Byung Gun Lim; Young Sung Kim; Heezoo Kim; Myoung Hoon Kong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Reversal agents: do we need to administer with neuromuscular monitoring - an observational study.

Authors:  Shilpa Goyal; Nikhil Kothari; Deepak Chaudhary; Shilpi Verma; Pooja Bihani; Mahaveer Singh Rodha
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2018-03

6.  Clarifications on Technologies to Optimize Care of Severe COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Sorin J Brull; Aaron F Kopman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 6.627

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.