Yueyue Wang1, Xiaoke Li, Jiang Chang, Chengtie Wu, Yan Deng. 1. State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1295 Dingxi Road, Shanghai 200050, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Ca(3)SiO(5) on reducing enamel demineralization under pH-cycling conditions. METHODS: Forty bovine enamel samples were treated under four conditions: group 1, double distilled water (negative control); group 2, 1000 ppm F (as NaF, positive control); group 3, Ca(3)SiO(5) slurry; and group 4, Ca(3)SiO(5)-F slurry (Ca(3)SiO(5) with 1000 ppm F aq.). All the specimens were treated with treatment materials 4 times each day. Samples in groups 1 and 2 were soaked in test solutions for 2 min and samples in groups 3 and 4 were painted in treatment slurry for 2 min. At times between treatments, they were immersed in citric acid solution 3 times a day and 15 s each time. All the procedures were repeated for 7 days. Knoop microhardness, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and atom force microscopy (AFM) were used to examine samples. RESULTS: After treatment for 7 days, enamels in all the groups were significantly softened. The extents of microhardness reduction were 52.3%, 28.5%, 28.5% and 20.2% for groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Samples in the negative control group showed a typical acid etched pattern while enamels in other groups were relatively compact. There was no significant difference between samples treated with Ca(3)SiO(5) and F. The combination of Ca(3)SiO(5) with F showed the best effect on reducing enamel demineralization. CONCLUSIONS: Ca(3)SiO(5) is an effective material against enamel demineralization alone but in combination with F a better anti-demineralization effect may be obtained.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Ca(3)SiO(5) on reducing enamel demineralization under pH-cycling conditions. METHODS: Forty bovine enamel samples were treated under four conditions: group 1, double distilled water (negative control); group 2, 1000 ppm F (as NaF, positive control); group 3, Ca(3)SiO(5) slurry; and group 4, Ca(3)SiO(5)-F slurry (Ca(3)SiO(5) with 1000 ppm F aq.). All the specimens were treated with treatment materials 4 times each day. Samples in groups 1 and 2 were soaked in test solutions for 2 min and samples in groups 3 and 4 were painted in treatment slurry for 2 min. At times between treatments, they were immersed in citric acid solution 3 times a day and 15 s each time. All the procedures were repeated for 7 days. Knoop microhardness, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and atom force microscopy (AFM) were used to examine samples. RESULTS: After treatment for 7 days, enamels in all the groups were significantly softened. The extents of microhardness reduction were 52.3%, 28.5%, 28.5% and 20.2% for groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Samples in the negative control group showed a typical acid etched pattern while enamels in other groups were relatively compact. There was no significant difference between samples treated with Ca(3)SiO(5) and F. The combination of Ca(3)SiO(5) with F showed the best effect on reducing enamel demineralization. CONCLUSIONS:Ca(3)SiO(5) is an effective material against enamel demineralization alone but in combination with F a better anti-demineralization effect may be obtained.