Literature DB >> 23000051

Is there a difference in perioperative mortality between cemented and uncemented implants in hip fracture surgery?

M Hossain1, J G Andrew.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although cemented implants have proven beneficial over uncemented implants for treatment of displaced sub-capital proximal femoral fractures, there are concerns regarding the haemodynamic consequence of using cemented implants in hip fracture patients. National Patient Safety Agency recently issued an alert regarding the use of cement in hip fracture surgery. We compared the incidence and pattern of 48 h perioperative mortality between patients receiving cemented and uncemented implants after hip fracture surgery.
METHODS: Using data prospectively recorded in hospital care records, we retrospectively reviewed the case records of all patients who died in hospital following hip fracture surgery between January 2005 and April 2010. We recorded demographic variables, type of fracture, implant used, medical co-morbidity, seniority of operating surgeon and anaesthetist, perioperative haemodynamic status, time and cause of death.
RESULTS: We identified 15 cases of perioperative death (PoD) over a 64-month period. PoD was 1% (15/1402). Eight of 15 deaths occurred following cemented hemiarthroplasty insertion. There were four cases of intra-operative death, two of them were following cemented hemiarthroplasty insertion. PoD following cemented hemiarthroplasty was 2.54% (8/314) and nil (0/168) following uncemented Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasty. Operations were performed by both trainees (six) and consultants (two). Both trainees (five) and consultants (three) anaesthetised the patients. None of the patients belonged to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II (ASA III 5 and IV 3). All patients had significant cardiovascular or pulmonary co-morbidity. Apart from the cases of immediate haemodynamic collapse and death, cemented implant insertion was followed by intra-operative haemodynamic instability in 2/15 and perioperative instability in 3/15 patients. Post-mortem was performed in 3/8 patients: 2/3 demonstrated pulmonary embolism (PE), 1/3 bronchopneumonia. Of the rest, 3/5 had suspected myocardial infarction (MI).
CONCLUSION: There was 1% risk of perioperative death after hip fracture surgery. Risk of perioperative death was significantly higher following cemented implant insertion. Mortality risk was exacerbated in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular morbidity and was independent of the seniority of the surgeon or the anaesthetist.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23000051     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  16 in total

1.  Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: 5-year followup of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Ellen Langslet; Frede Frihagen; Vidar Opland; Jan Erik Madsen; Lars Nordsletten; Wender Figved
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Does the Risk of Death Within 48 Hours of Hip Hemiarthroplasty Differ Between Patients Treated with Cemented and Cementless Implants? A Meta-analysis of Large, National Registries.

Authors:  Ola E Dahl; Are Hugo Pripp
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Is cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty a safe treatment for femoral neck fracture in elderly patients?

Authors:  Emre Yurdakul; Fatih Karaaslan; Murat Korkmaz; Fuat Duygulu; Ali Baktır
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Postoperative Mortality after Hip Fracture Surgery: A 3 Years Follow Up.

Authors:  Oya Kilci; Canan Un; Ozlem Sacan; Mehmet Gamli; Semih Baskan; Mustafa Baydar; Bulent Ozkurt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Early mortality and morbidity after total hip arthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Nils P Hailer; Anne Garland; Cecilia Rogmark; Göran Garellick; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 6.  Comparison of intramedullary fixation and arthroplasty for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Boyuan Nie; Dou Wu; Zhaohui Yang; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Hydroxyapatite coated hip hemiarthroplasty: Morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali Fazal; Sunil Shah; Padmanabhan Subramanian
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-05-08

Review 8.  Cemented versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Ahmed Fikry Elmenshawy; Khaled Hamed Salem
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-05-04

9.  Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Li; Qianyu Zhuang; Xisheng Weng; Lei Zhou; Yanyan Bian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Current trends of stem use in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in South Korea.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Lee; Ki-Choul Kim; Byung-Ho Yoon; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2014-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.