Literature DB >> 22999642

Influence of preparation techniques to the strength of the bone-cement interface behind the flange in total knee arthroplasty.

S A W van de Groes1, M C de Waal Malefijt, N Verdonschot.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recent clinical studies show an increased risk of femoral loosening in high-flexion TKA. Loosening seems to occur behind the anterior flange, which is covering both cancellous bone and cortical bone. It is important to optimize the interface strength between cement and both bone types to increase femoral component fixation. This study was performed to determine the cement-cortical bone interface strength for different preparation techniques.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A pure tensile and shear force was applied to interface specimens. The cortical surface area was prepared in three different ways: (1) Unprepared cortical bone with periosteum; (2) Periosteum removed and cortical bone roughened with a rasp; (3) Periosteum removed and three Ø 3.2mm holes drilled through the cortex. A reference group was added with a cancellous bone surface.
RESULTS: The interface tensile strength of Group 1 was 0.06 MPa and the shear strength was 0.05 MPa. For Group 2, respectively 0.22 MPa and 1.12 MPa. For Group 3, respectively 1.15 MPa and 1.77 MPa. For cancellous bone a tensile strength of 1.79 MPa and a shear strength of 3.85 MPa were measured.
CONCLUSION: The strength of the cement-cancellous bone interface is superior to the cement-cortical bone interface. The preferred preparation technique of the cortical bone is to remove all the periosteum and drill holes through the cortex within the footprint of the anterior flange, to prevent cortical weakening. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ultimately, the proposed preparation technique will lead to longer implant survival, particularly for prostheses which are used in the high-flexion range.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22999642     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  6 in total

1.  The distribution of implant fixation for femoral components of TKA: a postmortem retrieval study.

Authors:  Karen I Howard; Mark A Miller; Timothy A Damron; Kenneth A Mann
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Bone Cements Used for Hip Prosthesis Fixation: The Influence of the Handling Procedures on Functional Properties Observed during In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Alina Robu; Robert Ciocoiu; Aurora Antoniac; Iulian Antoniac; Anca Daniela Raiciu; Horatiu Dura; Norin Forna; Mihai Bogdan Cristea; Ioana Dana Carstoc
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  The effect of multiple drilling on a sclerotic proximal tibia during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Ahn; Seung Hyo Jeong; Sung Hyun Lee
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  How Much Bone Cement Is Utilized for Component Fixation in Primary Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Bhava R J Satish; Mohan Thadi; Subbiahgounder Thirumalaisamy; Apsingi Sunil; Praveen L Basanagoudar; Bernard Leo
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-09

5.  Squatting-related tibiofemoral shear reaction forces and a biomechanical rationale for femoral component loosening.

Authors:  Ashvin Thambyah; Justin Fernandez
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-05-20

6.  Cementing technique for primary knee arthroplasty: a scoping review.

Authors:  Anders M Refsum; Uy V Nguyen; Jan-Erik Gjertsen; Birgitte Espehaug; Anne M Fenstad; Regina K Lein; Peter Ellison; Paul J Høl; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 3.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.