Literature DB >> 22999137

Costs of adverse drug events in German hospitals--a microcosting study.

Dominik Rottenkolber1, Joerg Hasford, Jürgen Stausberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In Germany, only limited data are available to quantify the attributable resource utilization associated with adverse drug events (ADEs). The aim of this study was twofold: first, to calculate the direct treatment costs associated with ADEs leading to hospitalization and, second, to derive the excess costs and extra hospital days attributable to ADEs of inpatient treatments in selected German hospitals.
METHODS: This was a retrospective and medical record-based study performed from the hospitals' perspective based on administrative accounting data from three hospitals (49,462 patients) in Germany. Total treatment costs ("analysis 1") and excess costs (i.e., incremental resource utilization) between patients suffering from an ADE and those without ADEs were calculated by means of a propensity score-based matching algorithm ("analysis 2").
RESULTS: Mean treatment costs ("analysis 1") of ADEs leading to hospitalization (n = 564) were €1,978 ± 2,036 (range €191-18,147; median €1,446; €843-2,480 [Q1-Q3]). In analysis 2, the mean costs of inpatients suffering from an ADE (n = 1,891) as a concomitant disease or complication (€5,113 ± 10,059; range €179-246,288; median €2,701; €1,636-5,111 [Q1-Q3]) were significantly higher (€970; P < 0.0001) than those of non-ADE inpatients (€4,143 ± 6,968; range €154-148,479; median €2,387; €1,432-4,701 [Q1-Q3]). Mean inpatient length of stay of ADE patients (12.7 ± 17.2 days) and non-ADE patients (9.8 ± 11.6 days) differed by 2.9 days (P < 0.0001). A nationwide extrapolation resulted in annual total treatment costs of €1.058 billion.
CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first administrative data-based analyses calculating the economic consequences of ADEs in Germany. Further efforts are necessary to improve pharmacotherapy and relieve health care payers of preventable treatment costs.
Copyright © 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22999137     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  20 in total

Review 1.  Routine deprescribing of chronic medications to combat polypharmacy.

Authors:  Doron Garfinkel; Birkan Ilhan; Gulistan Bahat
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2015-12

2.  Potential Direct Costs of Adverse Drug Events and Possible Cost Savings Achievable by their Prevention in Tuscany, Italy: A Model-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Irma Convertino; Stefano Salvadori; Alessandro Pecori; Maria Teresa Galiulo; Sara Ferraro; Maria Parrilli; Tiberio Corona; Giuseppe Turchetti; Corrado Blandizzi; Marco Tuccori
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Cost-effectiveness of check of medication appropriateness: methodological approach.

Authors:  Erinn D'hulster; Charlotte Quintens; Jeroen Luyten; Raf Bisschops; Rik Willems; Willy E Peetermans; Jan Y Verbakel
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2022-01-11

4.  A systematic review of approaches for calculating the cost of medication errors.

Authors:  Krishan Patel; Robert Jay; Muhammad Waseem Shahzad; William Green; Rakesh Patel
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2016-06-08

5.  International prevalence of adverse drug events in hospitals: an analysis of routine data from England, Germany, and the USA.

Authors:  Jürgen Stausberg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Patient stratification and identification of adverse event correlations in the space of 1190 drug related adverse events.

Authors:  Eva Roitmann; Robert Eriksson; Søren Brunak
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Excess length of stay and economic consequences of adverse events in Dutch hospital patients.

Authors:  Janneke Hoogervorst-Schilp; Maaike Langelaan; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Martine C de Bruijne; Cordula Wagner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  Personalised, predictive and preventive medication process in hospitals-still rather missing: professional opinion survey on medication safety in Czech hospitals (based on professional opinions of recognised Czech health care experts).

Authors:  Zeno Veselik
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 6.543

9.  Cost-outcome description of clinical pharmacist interventions in a university teaching hospital.

Authors:  James Gallagher; Stephen Byrne; Noel Woods; Deirdre Lynch; Suzanne McCarthy
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  The effect of electronic medical record system use on communication between pharmacists and prescribers.

Authors:  Alexander Singer; Roberto Duarte Fernandez
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.