| Literature DB >> 22999061 |
Xun Cao1, Lin Zhang, Gui-Rong Feng, Juan Yang, Ruo-Yan Wang, Jun Li, Xiao-Min Zheng, Yu-Jing Han.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the predictive significance of preoperative serum level of cytokeratin 19 fragments (Cyfra21-1) and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) after complete resection in patients with stage II esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22999061 PMCID: PMC3548759 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Characteristics of the ESCC patients
| Age, years† | |
| ≤ 60 | 128 (33.8%) |
| > 60 | 251 (66.2%) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 221 (58.3%) |
| Female | 158 (41.7%) |
| Operative procedure | |
| Left thoracotomy | 253 (66.8%) |
| Ivor-Lewis/Three-field technique‡ | 126 (33.2%) |
| Tumor location | |
| Upper | 20 (5.3%) |
| Middle | 260 (68.6%) |
| Lower | 99 (26.1%) |
| Tumor Grade | |
| Grade 1 | 80 (21.1%) |
| Grade 2 | 250 (65.9%) |
| Grade 3 | 49 (13.0%) |
| Pathological T status | |
| T1 | 39 (10.3%) |
| T2 | 213 (56.2%) |
| T3 | 127 (33.5%) |
| Pathological N status | |
| N0 | 127 (33.5%) |
| N1 | 252 (66.5%) |
| Pathological TNM stage | |
| Stage IIA | 127 (33.5%) |
| Stage IIB | 252 (66.5%) |
| Cyfra21-1 level | |
| Low (≤3.30 ng/ml) | 198 (52.2%) |
| High (>3.30 ng/ml) | 181 (47.8%) |
| SCC-Ag level | |
| Low (≤1.5 μg/L) | 103 (27.2%) |
| High (>1.5 μg/L) | 276 (72.8%) |
Abbreviation: T, tumor; N, node; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.
† Median age; ‡Thoracic-abdominal-cervical incision.
The associations between Cyfra21-1 level, SCC-Ag level and the clinicopathological characteristics
| | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tumor location | | | | 0.312 | | | 0.136 |
| Upper | 20 (05.3%) | 12 (60.0%) | 8 (40.0%) | | 9 (45.0%) | 11 (55.0%) | |
| Middle | 260 (68.6%) | 129 (49.6%) | 131 (50.4%) | | 71 (27.3%) | 189 (72.7%) | |
| Lower | 99 (26.1%) | 57 (57.6%) | 42 (42.4%) | | 23 (23.2%) | 76 (76.8%) | |
| Tumor grade | | | | 0.191 | | | 0.771 |
| Grade 1 | 80 (21.1%) | 49 (61.2%) | 31 (38.8%) | | 24 (30.0%) | 56 (70.0%) | |
| Grade 2 | 250 (65.9%) | 125 (50.0%) | 125 (50.0%) | | 67 (26.8%) | 183 (73.2%) | |
| Grade 3 | 49 (13.0%) | 24 (49.0%) | 25 (51.0%) | | 12 (24.5%) | 37 (75.5%) | |
| pT status | | | | 0.899 | | | 0.594 |
| pT1 | 39 (10.3%) | 20 (51.3%) | 19 (48.7%) | | 12 (30.8%) | 27 (69.2%) | |
| pT2/3 | 213 (56.2%) | 178 (52.4%) | 162 (47.6%) | | 91 (26.8%) | 249 (73.2%) | |
| pN status | | | | 0.059 | | | 0.005 |
| pN0 | 127 (33.5%) | 75 (59.1%) | 52 (40.9%) | | 46 (36.2%) | 81 (63.8%) | |
| pN1 | 252 (66.5%) | 123 (48.8%) | 129 (51.2%) | | 57 (22.6%) | 195 (77.4%) | |
| pTNM stage | | | | 0.059 | | | 0.005 |
| Stage IIA | 127 (33.5%) | 75 (59.1%) | 52 (40.9%) | | 46 (36.2%) | 81 (63.8%) | |
| Stage IIB | 252 (66.5%) | 123 (48.8%) | 129 (51.2%) | 57 (22.6%) | 195 (77.4%) | ||
Abbreviation: pT, pathological tumor; pN, pathological node; pTNM stage, pathological tumor-node-metastasis stage.
*χ2 test.
Figure 1Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in patients with stage II ESCC. (A) Overall survival curve for whole cohort of patients with stage II ESCC; (B) Overall survival curve for whole cohort of patients with stage II ESCC according to the preoperative serum level of Cyfra21-1; (C) Overall survival curve for whole cohort of patients with stage II ESCC according to the preoperative serum level of SCC-Ag; (D) Overall survival curve for whole cohort of patients with stage II ESCC according to the preoperative serum level of Cyfra21-1 and SCC-Ag (double-normal subset vs. either-normal subset vs. double-high subset).
Prognostic value of preoperative Cyfra21-1 and SCC-Ag level in ESCC patients
| Total | | | | <0.001 | | | | <0.001 |
| Low | 198 | 91.9 | 85% | | 103 | 89.7 | 82% | |
| High | 181 | 46.6 | 33% | | 276 | 63.7 | 53% | |
| pTNM stage | | | | | | | | |
| Stage IIA | | | | <0.001 | | | | 0.069 |
| Low | 75 | 102.6 | 93% | | 46 | 85.7 | 86% | |
| High | 52 | 59.9 | 54% | | 81 | 78.2 | 72% | |
| Stage IIB | | | | <0.001 | | | | <0.001 |
| Low | 123 | 84.4 | 80% | | 57 | 73.7 | 78% | |
| High | 129 | 41.1 | 25% | 195 | 57.1 | 45% | ||
Abbreviation: pTNM stage, pathological tumor-node-metastasis stage.
* Log-rank test.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis for overall survival in patients with ESCC
| | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 1.014 | 1.001 to 1.028 | 0.038 | 0.998 | 0.985-1.012 | 0.764 |
| Sex | | | | | | |
| Male vs. Female | 1.212 | 0.902 to 1.629 | 0.202 | - | - | - |
| Tumor location | | | | | | |
| Upper vs. Middle vs. Lower | 0.980 | 0.558 to 1,611 | 0.318 | - | - | - |
| Tumor Grade | | | | | | |
| Grade 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 | 1.668 | 1.085 to 2.166 | 0.056 | - | - | - |
| pTNM stage | | | | | | |
| Stage IIA vs. Stage IIB | 2.283 | 1.600 to 3.257 | <0.001 | 2.191 | 1.533 to 3.132 | <0.001 |
| Cyfra21-1 level | | | | | | |
| Low vs. High | 7.439 | 5.178 to 10.686 | <0.001 | 7.149 | 4.961 to 10.303 | <0.001 |
| SCC-Ag level | | | | | | |
| Low vs. High | 3.940 | 2.229 to 6.964 | <0.001 | 2.926 | 1.655 to 5.175 | <0.001 |
Abbreviation: HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; pTNM stage, pathological tumor-node-metastasis stage.
* Cox proportional hazards model.