Literature DB >> 22998781

Core outcome measures for opioid abuse liability laboratory assessment studies in humans: IMMPACT recommendations.

Sandra D Comer1, James P Zacny, Robert H Dworkin, Dennis C Turk, George E Bigelow, Richard W Foltin, Donald R Jasinski, Edward M Sellers, Edgar H Adams, Robert Balster, Laurie B Burke, Igor Cerny, Robert D Colucci, Edward Cone, Penney Cowan, John T Farrar, David J Haddox, Jennifer A Haythornthwaite, Sharon Hertz, Gary W Jay, Chris-Ellyn Johanson, Roderick Junor, Nathaniel P Katz, Michael Klein, Ernest A Kopecky, Deborah B Leiderman, Michael P McDermott, Charles O'Brien, Alec B O'Connor, Pamela P Palmer, Srinivasa N Raja, Bob A Rappaport, Christine Rauschkolb, Michael C Rowbotham, Cristina Sampaio, Beatrice Setnik, Marta Sokolowska, Joseph W Stauffer, Sharon L Walsh.   

Abstract

A critical component in development of opioid analgesics is assessment of their abuse liability (AL). Standardization of approaches and measures used in assessing AL have the potential to facilitate comparisons across studies, research laboratories, and drugs. The goal of this report is to provide consensus recommendations regarding core outcome measures for assessing the abuse potential of opioid medications in humans in a controlled laboratory setting. Although many of the recommended measures are appropriate for assessing the AL of medications from other drug classes, the focus here is on opioid medications because they present unique risks from both physiological (e.g., respiratory depression, physical dependence) and public health (e.g., individuals in pain) perspectives. A brief historical perspective on AL testing is provided, and those measures that can be considered primary and secondary outcomes and possible additional outcomes in AL assessment are then discussed. These outcome measures include the following: subjective effects (some of which comprise the primary outcome measures, including drug liking; physiological responses; drug self-administration behavior; and cognitive and psychomotor performance. Before presenting recommendations for standardized approaches and measures to be used in AL assessments, the appropriateness of using these measures in clinical trials with patients in pain is discussed. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22998781      PMCID: PMC3494795          DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.07.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  26 in total

Review 1.  The risk for problematic opioid use in chronic pain: What can we learn from studies of pain and reward?

Authors:  Patrick H Finan; Bethany Remeniuk; Kelly E Dunn
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 5.067

Review 2.  Instruments to Identify Prescription Medication Misuse, Abuse, and Related Events in Clinical Trials: An ACTTION Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shannon M Smith; Florence Paillard; Andrew McKeown; Laurie B Burke; Robert R Edwards; Nathaniel P Katz; Elektra J Papadopoulos; Bob A Rappaport; Ashley Slagle; Eric C Strain; Ajay D Wasan; Dennis C Turk; Robert H Dworkin
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Risk based in vitro performance assessment of extended release abuse deterrent formulations.

Authors:  Xiaoming Xu; Abhay Gupta; Manar Al-Ghabeish; Silvia N Calderon; Mansoor A Khan
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 5.875

4.  Relationship between oral D-amphetamine self-administration and ratings of subjective effects: do subjective-effects ratings correspond with a progressive-ratio measure of drug-taking behavior?

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Anna R Reynolds; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 5.  Fentanyl: Receptor pharmacology, abuse potential, and implications for treatment.

Authors:  Sandra D Comer; Catherine M Cahill
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Desmetramadol Has the Safety and Analgesic Profile of Tramadol Without Its Metabolic Liabilities: Consecutive Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Active Comparator-Controlled Trials.

Authors:  John A Zebala; Shawn L Searle; Lynn R Webster; Matt S Johnson; Aaron D Schuler; Dean Y Maeda; Stuart J Kahn
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Relationship between intranasal cocaine self-administration and subject-rated effects: predictors of cocaine taking on progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  Justin C Strickland; Joshua A Lile; Craig R Rush; William W Stoops
Journal:  Hum Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.672

Review 8.  Glial and neuroinflammatory targets for treating substance use disorders.

Authors:  Ryan K Bachtell; Jermaine D Jones; Keith G Heinzerling; Patrick M Beardsley; Sandra D Comer
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Assessing the contribution of opioid- and dopamine-related genetic polymorphisms to the abuse liability of oxycodone.

Authors:  Jermaine D Jones; Mudassir Mumtaz; Jeanne M Manubay; Shanthi Mogali; Elliana Sherwin; Suky Martinez; Sandra D Comer
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Individual differences in human opioid abuse potential as observed in a human laboratory study.

Authors:  Kelly E Dunn; Frederick S Barrett; Bruna Brands; David C Marsh; George E Bigelow
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.