Literature DB >> 22998376

Characterization of the distal esophagus high-pressure zone with manometry, ultrasound and micro-computed tomography.

A K Vegesna1, J A Sloan, B Singh, S J Phillips, A S Braverman, M F Barbe, M R Ruggieri, L S Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine how the individual components of the distal esophagus and proximal stomach form the gastroesophageal junction high-pressure zone (GEJHPZ) antireflux barrier.
METHODS: An endoscopic ultrasound/manometry catheter was pulled through the proximal stomach and distal esophagus in 20 normal subjects. The axial length and width of individual structures on endoscopic ultrasound were measured. The anatomic orientation of gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) components was examined in two organ donor specimens using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). KEY
RESULTS: The three distinct structures identified within the GEJHPZ, from distal to proximal, were as follows: the gastric clasp and sling muscle fiber complex, crural diaphragm, and lower esophageal circular smooth muscle fibers (LEC). The LEC was statistically significantly thicker than adjacent esophageal muscles. These structures were associated with three pressure peaks. The pressure peak produced by the clasp/sling fiber complex often overlapped with the pressure peak from the crural diaphragm. The most proximal peak, associated with the LEC, was significantly greater and bimodal in nine of 20 subjects. This bimodal LEC pressure peak correlated with two areas of thickened muscle observed with ultrasound. Micro-CT of GEJ from organ donors confirmed the two areas of thickened muscle. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Three distinct anatomic structures, the clasp and sling muscle fibers, crural diaphragm, and LEC combine to form the antireflux barrier of the proximal stomach and distal esophagus. The clasp and sling muscle fibers combine with the crural diaphragm to form a distal pressure profile. The more proximal LEC has a bimodal pressure profile in some patients.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22998376      PMCID: PMC3530622          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  18 in total

1.  Three-dimensional pressure image and muscular structure of the human lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  H J Stein; D Liebermann-Meffert; T R DeMeester; J R Siewert
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Use of simultaneous high-resolution endoluminal sonography (HRES) and manometry to characterize high pressure zone of distal esophagus.

Authors:  W H McCray; C Chung; H P Parkman; L S Miller
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Effect of atropine on the frequency of reflux and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation in normal subjects.

Authors:  R K Mittal; R Holloway; J Dent
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Human lower esophageal sphincter pressure response to increased intra-abdominal pressure.

Authors:  R K Mittal; M Fisher; R W McCallum; D F Rochester; J Dent; J Sluss
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-04

5.  Integrity of cholinergic innervation to the lower esophageal sphincter in achalasia.

Authors:  R H Holloway; W J Dodds; J F Helm; W J Hogan; J Dent; R C Arndorfer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Different responsiveness of excitatory and inhibitory enteric motor neurons in the human esophagus to electrical field stimulation and to nicotine.

Authors:  Asensio A González; Ricard Farré; Pere Clavé
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 4.052

7.  Muscular equivalent of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  D Liebermann-Meffert; M Allgöwer; P Schmid; A L Blum
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Effect of atropine on esophageal motor function in humans.

Authors:  W J Dodds; J Dent; W J Hogan; R C Arndorfer
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1981-04

9.  A missing sphincteric component of the gastro-oesophageal junction in patients with GORD.

Authors:  L Miller; Q Dai; A Vegesna; A Korimilli; R Ulerich; B Schiffner; J Brassuer
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  Transnasal US of the esophagus: preliminary morphologic and function studies.

Authors:  J B Liu; L S Miller; B B Goldberg; R I Feld; A A Alexander; L Needleman; D O Castell; P J Klenn; C L Millward
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Physiology of the upper segment, body, and lower segment of the esophagus.

Authors:  Larry Miller; Pere Clavé; Ricard Farré; Begoña Lecea; Michael R Ruggieri; Ann Ouyang; Julie Regan; Barry P McMahon
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of neovasculature in solid tumors and basement membrane matrix using ex vivo X-ray microcomputed tomography.

Authors:  Seunghyung Lee; Mary F Barbe; Rosario Scalia; Lawrence E Goldfinger
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Effect of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for submucosal tumors at esophagogastric junction and risk factors for failure of en bloc resection.

Authors:  Zhenjuan Li; Ying Gao; Ningli Chai; Ying Xiong; Lianjun Ma; Wengang Zhang; Chen Du; Enqiang Linghu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Three-Dimensional Myoarchitecture of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter and Esophageal Hiatus Using Optical Sectioning Microscopy.

Authors:  Ali Zifan; Dushyant Kumar; Leo K Cheng; Ravinder K Mittal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.