AIMS: Diabetes impinges upon mechanisms of cardiovascular repair. However, the biochemical adaptation of cardiac stem cells to sustained hyperglycaemia remains largely unknown. Here, we investigate the molecular targets of high glucose-induced damage in cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) from murine and human hearts and attempt safeguarding CPC viability and function through reactivation of the pentose phosphate pathway. METHODS AND RESULTS: Type-1 diabetes was induced by streptozotocin. CPC abundance was determined by flow cytometry. Proliferating CPCs were identified in situ by immunostaining for the proliferation marker Ki67. Diabetic hearts showed marked reduction in CPC abundance and proliferation when compared with controls. Moreover, Sca-1(pos) CPCs isolated from hearts of diabetic mice displayed reduced activity of key enzymes of the pentose phosphate pathway, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), and transketolase, increased levels of superoxide and advanced glucose end-products (AGE), and inhibition of the Akt/Pim-1/Bcl-2 signalling pathway. Similarly, culture of murine CPCs or human CD105(pos) progenitor cells in high glucose inhibits the pentose phosphate and pro-survival signalling pathways, leading to the activation of apoptosis. In vivo and in vitro supplementation with benfotiamine reactivates the pentose phosphate pathway and rescues CPC availability and function. This benefit is abrogated by either G6PD silencing by small interfering RNA (siRNA) or Akt inhibition by dominant-negative Akt. CONCLUSION: We provide new evidence of the negative impact of diabetes and high glucose on mechanisms controlling CPC redox state and survival. Boosting the pentose phosphate pathway might represent a novel mechanistic target for protection of CPC integrity.
AIMS: Diabetes impinges upon mechanisms of cardiovascular repair. However, the biochemical adaptation of cardiac stem cells to sustained hyperglycaemia remains largely unknown. Here, we investigate the molecular targets of high glucose-induced damage in cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) from murine and human hearts and attempt safeguarding CPC viability and function through reactivation of the pentose phosphate pathway. METHODS AND RESULTS: Type-1 diabetes was induced by streptozotocin. CPC abundance was determined by flow cytometry. Proliferating CPCs were identified in situ by immunostaining for the proliferation marker Ki67. Diabetic hearts showed marked reduction in CPC abundance and proliferation when compared with controls. Moreover, Sca-1(pos) CPCs isolated from hearts of diabetic mice displayed reduced activity of key enzymes of the pentose phosphate pathway, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), and transketolase, increased levels of superoxide and advanced glucose end-products (AGE), and inhibition of the Akt/Pim-1/Bcl-2 signalling pathway. Similarly, culture of murine CPCs or human CD105(pos) progenitor cells in high glucose inhibits the pentose phosphate and pro-survival signalling pathways, leading to the activation of apoptosis. In vivo and in vitro supplementation with benfotiamine reactivates the pentose phosphate pathway and rescues CPC availability and function. This benefit is abrogated by either G6PD silencing by small interfering RNA (siRNA) or Akt inhibition by dominant-negative Akt. CONCLUSION: We provide new evidence of the negative impact of diabetes and high glucose on mechanisms controlling CPC redox state and survival. Boosting the pentose phosphate pathway might represent a novel mechanistic target for protection of CPC integrity.
Authors: S Gadau; C Emanueli; S Van Linthout; G Graiani; M Todaro; M Meloni; I Campesi; G Invernici; F Spillmann; K Ward; P Madeddu Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2006-01-17 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Andrea Caporali; Elisabetta Pani; Anton J G Horrevoets; Nicolle Kraenkel; Atsuhiko Oikawa; Graciela B Sala-Newby; Marco Meloni; Brunella Cristofaro; Gallia Graiani; Aurelie S Leroyer; Chantal M Boulanger; Gaia Spinetti; Sung Ok Yoon; Paolo Madeddu; Costanza Emanueli Journal: Circ Res Date: 2008-06-19 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Raj R Makkar; Rachel R Smith; Ke Cheng; Konstantinos Malliaras; Louise Ej Thomson; Daniel Berman; Lawrence Sc Czer; Linda Marbán; Adam Mendizabal; Peter V Johnston; Stuart D Russell; Karl H Schuleri; Albert C Lardo; Gary Gerstenblith; Eduardo Marbán Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Giovanni G Camici; Marzia Schiavoni; Pietro Francia; Markus Bachschmid; Ines Martin-Padura; Martin Hersberger; Felix C Tanner; Piergiuseppe Pelicci; Massimo Volpe; Piero Anversa; Thomas F Lüscher; Francesco Cosentino Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-03-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mohit Jain; Daniel A Brenner; Lei Cui; Chee Chew Lim; Bo Wang; David R Pimentel; Stanley Koh; Douglas B Sawyer; Jane A Leopold; Diane E Handy; Joseph Loscalzo; Carl S Apstein; Ronglih Liao Journal: Circ Res Date: 2003-06-26 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Joshua K Salabei; Pawel K Lorkiewicz; Parul Mehra; Andrew A Gibb; Petra Haberzettl; Kyung U Hong; Xiaoli Wei; Xiang Zhang; Qianhong Li; Marcin Wysoczynski; Roberto Bolli; Aruni Bhatnagar; Bradford G Hill Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Molly R Kelly-Goss; Rick S Sweat; Peter C Stapor; Shayn M Peirce; Walter L Murfee Journal: Microcirculation Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Nima Purvis; Sweta Kumari; Dhananjie Chandrasekera; Jayanthi Bellae Papannarao; Sophie Gandhi; Isabelle van Hout; Sean Coffey; Richard Bunton; Ramanen Sugunesegran; Dominic Parry; Philip Davis; Michael J A Williams; Andrew Bahn; Rajesh Katare Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2021-03-02 Impact factor: 10.122