OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the vessel wall enables determination of luminal area, vessel wall thickness, and atherosclerotic plaque characteristics. For clinical application, high spatial resolution, derived from optimal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), is paramount. Vessel wall MRI is expected to benefit from higher magnetic field strength. Therefore, the purposes of the present study were to develop an ultrahigh-field 7-T MRI hardware and protocols for vessel wall imaging of the carotid artery and to compare quantitative parameters of vessel wall morphology and image quality between 3-T and 7-T MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen volunteers (11 men and 7 women; mean [SD] age, 29 [7] years) underwent MRI examinations at 7 T (using a custom-built surface transmit/receive coil of 15-cm diameter) and at 3 T (using a commercial phased-array coil with 2 flexible oval elements, 14 × 17 cm each). Magnetic resonance imaging of the left common carotid artery vessel wall was performed at 7 T with identical in-plane resolution as that of 3-T MRI (0.46 × 0.46 mm), providing transverse T1- and T2-weighted images. Blinded analysis of morphologic measurements (luminal area and vessel wall area), SNR for vessel wall (SNRVW), and the CNR between the lumen and the vessel wall were compared between 7 and 3 T. RESULTS: Morphologic carotid vessel wall measurements were comparable between 7 and 3 T for both T1-weighted images (luminal area: intraclass correlation [ICC], 0.81 and vessel wall area: ICC, 0.84) and T2-weighted images (luminal area: ICC, 0.97 and vessel wall area: ICC, 0.92). At 7 T, SNRVW and CNR were significantly higher compared with 3-T MRI for both T1- (P < 0.001) and T2-weighted images (P < 0.05), with gain factors ranging from 1.3 to 3.6. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrahigh-field 7-T MR carotid vessel wall imaging is feasible. 7-T MRI of the common carotid artery has comparable accuracy for determining luminal area and vessel wall area and has improved SNRVW and CNR compared with 3-T MRI. Therefore, ultrahigh-field 7-T vessel wall MRI may enable a more detailed assessment of plaque morphology.
OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the vessel wall enables determination of luminal area, vessel wall thickness, and atherosclerotic plaque characteristics. For clinical application, high spatial resolution, derived from optimal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), is paramount. Vessel wall MRI is expected to benefit from higher magnetic field strength. Therefore, the purposes of the present study were to develop an ultrahigh-field 7-T MRI hardware and protocols for vessel wall imaging of the carotid artery and to compare quantitative parameters of vessel wall morphology and image quality between 3-T and 7-T MRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighteen volunteers (11 men and 7 women; mean [SD] age, 29 [7] years) underwent MRI examinations at 7 T (using a custom-built surface transmit/receive coil of 15-cm diameter) and at 3 T (using a commercial phased-array coil with 2 flexible oval elements, 14 × 17 cm each). Magnetic resonance imaging of the left common carotid artery vessel wall was performed at 7 T with identical in-plane resolution as that of 3-T MRI (0.46 × 0.46 mm), providing transverse T1- and T2-weighted images. Blinded analysis of morphologic measurements (luminal area and vessel wall area), SNR for vessel wall (SNRVW), and the CNR between the lumen and the vessel wall were compared between 7 and 3 T. RESULTS: Morphologic carotid vessel wall measurements were comparable between 7 and 3 T for both T1-weighted images (luminal area: intraclass correlation [ICC], 0.81 and vessel wall area: ICC, 0.84) and T2-weighted images (luminal area: ICC, 0.97 and vessel wall area: ICC, 0.92). At 7 T, SNRVW and CNR were significantly higher compared with 3-T MRI for both T1- (P < 0.001) and T2-weighted images (P < 0.05), with gain factors ranging from 1.3 to 3.6. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrahigh-field 7-T MR carotid vessel wall imaging is feasible. 7-T MRI of the common carotid artery has comparable accuracy for determining luminal area and vessel wall area and has improved SNRVW and CNR compared with 3-T MRI. Therefore, ultrahigh-field 7-T vessel wall MRI may enable a more detailed assessment of plaque morphology.
Authors: E S J Kröner; J van der Grond; J J M Westenberg; E E van der Wall; H-M J Siebelink; H J Lamb Journal: Neth Heart J Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.380
Authors: Bram F Coolen; Claudia Calcagno; Pim van Ooij; Zahi A Fayad; Gustav J Strijkers; Aart J Nederveen Journal: MAGMA Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Martin J Willemink; Bram F Coolen; Hadrien Dyvorne; Philip M Robson; Ilda Bander; Seigo Ishino; Alison Pruzan; Arthi Sridhar; Bei Zhang; Priti Balchandani; Venkatesh Mani; Gustav J Strijkers; Aart J Nederveen; Tim Leiner; Zahi A Fayad; Willem J M Mulder; Claudia Calcagno Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-14 Impact factor: 3.240