Literature DB >> 22996198

Statistical analyses and computational prediction of helical kinks in membrane proteins.

Y-H Huang1, C-M Chen.   

Abstract

We have carried out statistical analyses and computer simulations of helical kinks for TM helices in the PDBTM database. About 59 % of 1562 TM helices showed a significant kink, and 38 % of these kinks are associated with prolines in a range of ±4 residues. Our analyses show that helical kinks are more populated in the central region of helices, particularly in the range of 1-3 residues away from the helix center. Among 1,053 helical kinks analyzed, 88 % of kinks are bends (change in helix axis without loss of helical character) and 12 % are disruptions (change in helix axis and loss of helical character). It is found that proline residues tend to cause larger kink angles in helical bends, while this effect is not observed in helical disruptions. A further analysis of these kinked helices suggests that a kinked helix usually has 1-2 broken backbone hydrogen bonds with the corresponding N-O distance in the range of 4.2-8.7 Å, whose distribution is sharply peaked at 4.9 Å followed by an exponential decay with increasing distance. Our main aims of this study are to understand the formation of helical kinks and to predict their structural features. Therefore we further performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations under four simulation scenarios to investigate kink formation in 37 kinked TM helices and 5 unkinked TM helices. The representative models of these kinked helices are predicted by a clustering algorithm, SPICKER, from numerous decoy structures possessing the above generic features of kinked helices. Our results show an accuracy of 95 % in predicting the kink position of kinked TM helices and an error less than 10° in the angle prediction of 71.4 % kinked helices. For unkinked helices, based on various structure similarity tests, our predicted models are highly consistent with their crystal structure. These results provide strong supports for the validity of our method in predicting the structure of TM helices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22996198     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-012-9607-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  40 in total

1.  MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality.

Authors:  N Siew; A Elofsson; L Rychlewski; D Fischer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi,psi and Cbeta deviation.

Authors:  Simon C Lovell; Ian W Davis; W Bryan Arendall; Paul I W de Bakker; J Michael Word; Michael G Prisant; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-02-15

3.  Optimal potentials for predicting inter-helical packing in transmembrane proteins.

Authors:  H Dobbs; E Orlandini; R Bonaccini; F Seno
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-11-15

4.  Replica exchange Monte-Carlo simulations of helix bundle membrane proteins: rotational parameters of helices.

Authors:  H-H Wu; C-C Chen; C-M Chen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  A method for structural analysis of alpha-helices of membrane proteins.

Authors:  Pranab K Mohapatra; Adikanda Khamari; Mukesh K Raval
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2004-11-04       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Amino acid preferences for specific locations at the ends of alpha helices.

Authors:  J S Richardson; D C Richardson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Conformational dynamics of helix S6 from Shaker potassium channel: simulation studies.

Authors:  Joanne N Bright; Indira H Shrivastava; Frank S Cordes; Mark S P Sansom
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  Position of helical kinks in membrane protein crystal structures and the accuracy of computational prediction.

Authors:  Spencer E Hall; Kyle Roberts; Nagarajan Vaidehi
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 2.518

9.  The evolution of transmembrane helix kinks and the structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Sarah Yohannan; Salem Faham; Duan Yang; Julian P Whitelegge; James U Bowie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Coassembly of synthetic segments of shaker K+ channel within phospholipid membranes.

Authors:  H Peled-Zehavi; I T Arkin; D M Engelman; Y Shai
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1996-05-28       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  5 in total

1.  Identification of residues critical for topology inversion of the transmembrane protein TM4SF20 through regulated alternative translocation.

Authors:  Jingcheng Wang; Lisa N Kinch; Bray Denard; Ching-En Lee; Elina Esmaeilzadeh Gharehdaghi; Nick Grishin; Jin Ye
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Computational prediction of kink properties of helices in membrane proteins.

Authors:  T-L Mai; C-M Chen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Exploring conformational states and helical packings in the P2X receptor transmembrane domain by molecular dynamics simulation.

Authors:  Guo-Hua Li
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 1.365

Review 4.  Minireview: Toward the establishment of a link between melatonin and glucose homeostasis: association of melatonin MT2 receptor variants with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Angeliki Karamitri; Nicolas Renault; Nathalie Clement; Jean-Luc Guillaume; Ralf Jockers
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2013-06-24

5.  Structural basis for the Pr-Pfr long-range signaling mechanism of a full-length bacterial phytochrome at the atomic level.

Authors:  Lisandro H Otero; Sabrina Foscaldi; Giuliano T Antelo; Germán L Rosano; Serena Sirigu; Sebastián Klinke; Lucas A Defelipe; Maximiliano Sánchez-Lamas; Giovanni Battocchio; Valeria Conforte; Adrián A Vojnov; Leonard M G Chavas; Fernando A Goldbaum; Maria-Andrea Mroginski; Jimena Rinaldi; Hernán R Bonomi
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 14.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.