Literature DB >> 22996156

Influence of an intraoperative perilymph gusher on cochlear implant performance in children with labyrinthine malformations.

Oliver Franz Adunka1, Holly F B Teagle, Carlton J Zdanski, Craig A Buchman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of an intraoperative perilymph fluid gusher during cochlear implantation on speech perception abilities in pediatric patients with labyrinthine anomalies.
SETTING: Tertiary care academic referral center.
METHODS: Seventy subjects with labyrinthine malformations who received a cochlear implant were identified in our pediatric cochlear implant database. In 30 cases, an intraoperative perilymph fluid gusher was encountered during surgery. Fifteen children with GJB2 positive hereditary hearing loss served as controls. Multiple speech perception measures were obtained with the cochlear implant. The best score for each subject over time was determined as a speech reception index in quiet. This index was compared among groups and malformation types.
RESULTS: The speech reception index in quiet demonstrated overall good performance scores of cochlear implantation in children with incomplete partitioning/enlarged vestibular aqueduct type malformations. Children with hypoplastic malformations, on the other hand, showed variable outcomes with many children demonstrating only limited long-term speech discrimination abilities. The presence or absence of a perilymph gusher did not significantly influence results after cochlear implantation.
CONCLUSION: This report documents the variable outcomes of pediatric cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations. More importantly, anatomic parameters, such as the classification of the anomaly and the presence of a viable cochlear nerve, seem to influence performance measures substantially. The presence of a perilymph gusher did not influence outcomes in both hypoplastic and incomplete partitioning/enlarged vestibular aqueduct type malformations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b Individual retrospective cohort study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22996156     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31826a50a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  8 in total

1.  The Use of Lexical Neighborhood Test (LNT) in the Assessment of Speech Recognition Performance of Cochlear Implantees with Normal and Malformed Cochlea.

Authors:  Anjali R Kant; Arun A Banik
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-05-02

2.  Auditory Performance in Early Implanted Children with Cochleovestibular Malformation and Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Authors:  Iylia Ajmal Othman; Asma Abdullah; Goh Bee See; Cila Umat; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.017

3.  Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Pendred syndrome: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Authors:  Kirsty Biggs; Amy Lovett; Chris Metcalfe; Jameel Muzaffar; Peter Monksfield; Manohar Bance
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.017

4.  Systematic review of cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear malformations.

Authors:  Sunny Shah; Rameen Walters; Jake Langlie; Camron Davies; Ariel Finberg; Maria-Pia Tuset; Dario Ebode; Rahul Mittal; Adrien A Eshraghi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  Cochlear implantation in unique pediatric populations.

Authors:  Anna X Hang; Grace G Kim; Carlton J Zdanski
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Assessing the Benefit-Risk Profile for Pediatric Implantable Auditory Prostheses.

Authors:  Laurel M Fisher; Amy S Martinez; Frances J Richmond; Mark D Krieger; Eric P Wilkinson; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 1.778

7.  Effect of cochlear implantation on vestibular function in children: A scoping review.

Authors:  Max Gerdsen; Cathérine Jorissen; Daphne Catharina Francisca Pustjens; Janke Roelofke Hof; Vincent Van Rompaey; Raymond Van De Berg; Josine Christine Colette Widdershoven
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.569

8.  Prediction of Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Patients With Prelingual Deafness.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Kang; Myoung Jin Lee; Kyu-Yup Lee; Sang Heun Lee; Jeong Hun Jang
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 3.372

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.