Literature DB >> 22995779

The neural correlates of velocity processing during the observation of a biological effector in the parietal and premotor cortex.

Cinzia Di Dio1, Giuseppe Di Cesare, Satomi Higuchi, Neil Roberts, Stefan Vogt, Giacomo Rizzolatti.   

Abstract

While there have been several studies investigating the neural correlates of action observation associated with hand grasping movements, comparatively little is known about the neural bases of observation of reaching movements. In two experiments, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we defined the cortical areas encoding reaching movements and assessed their sensitivity to biological motion and to movement velocity. In the first experiment, participants observed video-clips showing either a biological effector (an arm) or a non-biological object (rolling cylinder) reaching toward a target with a biological and a non-biological motion, respectively. In the second experiment, participants observed video-clips showing either a biological effector (an arm) or a non-biological object (an arrow) reaching toward a target with the same biological motion profiles. The results of the two experiments revealed activation of superior parietal and dorsal premotor sites during observation of the biological motion only, independent of whether it was performed by a biological effector (reaching arm) or a non-biological object (reaching arrow). These areas were not activated when participants observed the non-biological movement (rolling cylinder). To assess the responsiveness of parietal and frontal sites to movement velocity, the fMRI repetition-suppression (RS) technique was used, in which movement was shown with same or different velocities between consecutive videos, and observation of identical stimuli was contrasted with observation of different stimuli. Regions of interest were defined in the parietal and frontal cortices, and their response to stimulus repetition was analyzed (same vs. different velocities). The results showed an RS effect for velocity only during the observation of movements performed by the biological effector and not by the non-biological object. These data indicate that dorsal premotor and superior parietal areas represent a neural substrate involved in the encoding of reaching movements and that their responsiveness to movement velocity of a biological effector could be instrumental to the discrimination of movements performed by others.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22995779     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  9 in total

1.  Low Fidelity Imitation of Atypical Biological Kinematics in Autism Spectrum Disorders Is Modulated by Self-Generated Selective Attention.

Authors:  Spencer J Hayes; Matthew Andrew; Digby Elliott; Emma Gowen; Simon J Bennett
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-02

2.  Alpha and beta band event-related desynchronization reflects kinematic regularities.

Authors:  Yaron Meirovitch; Hila Harris; Eran Dayan; Amos Arieli; Tamar Flash
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neural rhythmic symphony of human walking observation: Upside-down and Uncoordinated condition on cortical theta, alpha, beta and gamma oscillations.

Authors:  David Zarka; Carlos Cevallos; Mathieu Petieau; Thomas Hoellinger; Bernard Dan; Guy Cheron
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-18

4.  The organization of the posterior parietal cortex devoted to upper limb actions: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Stefania Ferri; Giacomo Rizzolatti; Guy A Orban
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Natural Translating Locomotion Modulates Cortical Activity at Action Observation.

Authors:  Thierry Pozzo; Alberto Inuggi; Alejo Keuroghlanian; Stefano Panzeri; Ghislain Saunier; Claudio Campus
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07

6.  Parieto-frontal mechanisms underlying observation of complex hand-object manipulation.

Authors:  Antonino Errante; Leonardo Fogassi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  How attitudes generated by humanoid robots shape human brain activity.

Authors:  G Di Cesare; F Vannucci; F Rea; A Sciutti; G Sandini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Automatic imitation in rhythmical actions: kinematic fidelity and the effects of compatibility, delay, and visual monitoring.

Authors:  Daniel L Eaves; Martine Turgeon; Stefan Vogt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Vitality Forms Processing in the Insula during Action Observation: A Multivoxel Pattern Analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Di Cesare; Giancarlo Valente; Cinzia Di Dio; Emanuele Ruffaldi; Massimo Bergamasco; Rainer Goebel; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.