OBJECTIVE: Paired-pulse somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are a common tool to investigate excitability in the human somatosensory cortex. Comparing literature about paired-pulse SEP, there is no standard set of stimulation parameters, while little is known about the influence of stimulation parameters on paired-pulse suppression. METHODS: We analyzed changes of paired-pulse ratios by varying repetition rates from 1 to 9Hz, and using stimulus intensities of 250% of the sensory threshold and 100%, 120%, and 140% of the motor threshold, which are most frequently used in studies using paired-pulse SEPs. RESULTS: We found a significant effect of repetition rate on paired-pulse suppression with increasing paired-pulse ratios from 1 to 9Hz, which is mainly caused by a change of single pulse amplitudes. We found no difference in paired-pulse suppression at the tested stimulation intensities. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of paired-pulse ratios across different studies should be interpreted with caution due to the high dependence on repetition rate, while the results at the commonly used stimulus intensities are comparable. SIGNIFICANCE: For an optimized parameter setting with sufficient paired-pulse suppression, we suggest a stimulation rate of 1 or 3Hz and a stimulation intensity of 250% of sensory threshold or slightly above motor threshold.
OBJECTIVE: Paired-pulse somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are a common tool to investigate excitability in the human somatosensory cortex. Comparing literature about paired-pulse SEP, there is no standard set of stimulation parameters, while little is known about the influence of stimulation parameters on paired-pulse suppression. METHODS: We analyzed changes of paired-pulse ratios by varying repetition rates from 1 to 9Hz, and using stimulus intensities of 250% of the sensory threshold and 100%, 120%, and 140% of the motor threshold, which are most frequently used in studies using paired-pulse SEPs. RESULTS: We found a significant effect of repetition rate on paired-pulse suppression with increasing paired-pulse ratios from 1 to 9Hz, which is mainly caused by a change of single pulse amplitudes. We found no difference in paired-pulse suppression at the tested stimulation intensities. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of paired-pulse ratios across different studies should be interpreted with caution due to the high dependence on repetition rate, while the results at the commonly used stimulus intensities are comparable. SIGNIFICANCE: For an optimized parameter setting with sufficient paired-pulse suppression, we suggest a stimulation rate of 1 or 3Hz and a stimulation intensity of 250% of sensory threshold or slightly above motor threshold.
Authors: Christina B Jones; Tea Lulic; Aaron Z Bailey; Tanner N Mackenzie; Yi Qun Mi; Mark Tommerdahl; Aimee J Nelson Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Robert Rehmann; Matthias Sczesny-Kaiser; Melanie Lenz; Tomasz Gucia; Annika Schliesing; Peter Schwenkreis; Martin Tegenthoff; Oliver Höffken Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Jan H Bettmann; Christine H Meyer-Frießem; Lauren M Schweizer; Lara Schlaffke; Peter K Zahn; Martin Tegenthoff; Oliver Höffken Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-12-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Matthias Sczesny-Kaiser; Oliver Höffken; Mirko Aach; Oliver Cruciger; Dennis Grasmücke; Renate Meindl; Thomas A Schildhauer; Peter Schwenkreis; Martin Tegenthoff Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 4.262