Literature DB >> 22995552

Arterial wall histology in chronic pulsatile-flow and continuous-flow device circulatory support.

Evgenij V Potapov1, Nikolay Dranishnikov, Lars Morawietz, Alexander Stepanenko, Sajjad Rezai, Cristiane Blechschmidt, Hans B Lehmkuhl, Yuguo Weng, Miralem Pasic, Michael Hübler, Roland Hetzer, Thomas Krabatsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuous-flow (CF) ventricular assist devices (VAD) are an established option for treatment of end-stage heart failure. However, the effect of long-term CF with lack of peripheral arterial wall motions on blood pressure regulation and end-organ arterial wall sclerosis, especially in the case of long-term support (> 3 years), remains unclear.
METHODS: Tissue samples obtained at autopsy from liver, kidney, coronary arteries, and brain from 27 VAD recipients supported for > 180 days between 2000 and 2010 were histologically examined to assess vascular alterations, including perivascular infiltrate, intravascular infiltrate, wall thickness, thrombosis, endothelial cell swelling, vessel wall necrosis, and peri-vascular fibrosis. Pulsatile-flow (PF) devices had been inserted in 9 patients and CF devices had been inserted in 16. The pathologist was blinded to the group distribution. Demographic, pharmacologic, and clinical data were retrospectively analyzed before surgery and during the follow-up period of up to 24 months.
RESULTS: Median duration of support was 467 days (range, 235-1,588 days) in the PF group and 263 days (range, 182-942 days) in the CF group. Demographic and clinical data before and after surgery were similar. Amiodarone was more often used during follow-up in CF group than in the PF group (61% vs 10%, p = 0.009). Throughout the follow-up period, mean arterial pressure did not differ between recipients of the 2 pump types, nor did systolic and diastolic pressure, except at 2 weeks after VAD implantation, when systolic blood pressure was higher (p = 0.05) and diastolic lower (p = 0.03) in the PF group. Histologic studies did not identify any relevant differences in arterial wall characteristics between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: Long-term mechanical circulatory support with CF devices does not adversely influence arterial wall properties of the end-organ vasculature.
Copyright © 2012 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22995552     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2012.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  10 in total

1.  Letter to the Editor regarding the article "Left ventricular assist devices: a kidney's perspective".

Authors:  Timothy K Cooper
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Absence of structural lesions in human renal arcuate arteries after LVAD implantation: response to a letter regarding "left ventricular assist devices: a kidney's perspective".

Authors:  Tycho R Tromp; Tri Q Nguyen; Nicolaas de Jonge; Jaap A Joles
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Rebuttal from William K. Cornwell III, Takashi Tarumi, Justin Lawley and Amrut V. Ambardekar.

Authors:  William K Cornwell; Takashi Tarumi; Justin Lawley; Amrut V Ambardekar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Physiological impact of continuous flow on end-organ function: clinical implications in the current era of left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Arvind Bhimaraj; Cesar Uribe; Erick E Suarez
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

5.  Comparison of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices: is there an advantage to pulsatility?

Authors:  Allen Cheng; Christine A Williamitis; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-11

6.  Living Without a Pulse: The Vascular Implications of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  Suneet N Purohit; William K Cornwell; Jay D Pal; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Amrut V Ambardekar
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 7.  Physiologic effects of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Aaron H Healy; Stephen H McKellar; Stavros G Drakos; Antigoni Koliopoulou; Josef Stehlik; Craig H Selzman
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 8.  Why pulsatility still matters: a review of current knowledge.

Authors:  Davor Barić
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.351

9.  A Comparative Study of Single and Dual Perfusion During End-ischemic Subnormothermic Liver Machine Preservation.

Authors:  Isabel M A Brüggenwirth; Carolina Moore; Paria Mahboub; Max F Thijssen; Xiaofei E; Henri G D Leuvenink; Pranoti Mandrekar; Xiaofei Wang; Timothy F Kowalik; Robert J Porte; Paulo N Martins
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2018-10-23

10.  Is flow really continuous in last generation continuous flow Ventricular Assist Devices? A comparison between HeartMate II and HeartWare HVAD.

Authors:  G Melisurgo; M De Bonis; M Pieri; T Nisi; S Silvetti; A Zangrillo; F Pappalardo
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2012
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.