Finders keepers: the features differentiating hoarding disorder from normative collecting.

OBJECTIVE: A new diagnostic category called Hoarding Disorder (HD) has been proposed for inclusion in DSM-5. It is paramount that this addition does not result in an over-pathologization of normative behavior. Collectors constitute a valid population within which to test the diagnostic boundaries of HD. The current study explored the features that differentiate pathological hoarding from normative collecting.
METHODS: Participants were 29 individuals with a diagnosis of HD and 20 individuals who self-identified as collectors who enrolled in the London Field Trial for HD. A series of semi-structured interviews (often in the participants' homes) were conducted, including a detailed assessment of the typical elements of the collecting process. Participants also completed a battery of self-report questionnaires.
RESULTS: Collectors were more likely than those with HD to be male, partnered, and free of psychiatric conditions or medication. Like those with HD, collectors reported the acquisition of, attachment to, and reluctance to discarding objects. However, the resulting clutter and impairment were minimal in this group and ultimately insufficient to garner an HD diagnosis. Collectors were, additionally, more focused in their acquisitions (e.g., confining their accumulations to a narrow range of items), more selective (e.g., planning and purchasing only pre-determined items), more likely to organize their possessions and less likely to accumulate in an excessive manner.
CONCLUSIONS: There are important quantitative and qualitative differences between HD and normative collecting. For this reason, collectors are unlikely to be inappropriately pathologized by the introduction of HD.