Literature DB >> 22995214

DNA double-strand break response in stem cells: mechanisms to maintain genomic integrity.

Pratik Nagaria1, Carine Robert, Feyruz V Rassool.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) represent the point of origin of all cells in a given organism and must protect their genomes from both endogenous and exogenous genotoxic stress. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are one of the most lethal forms of damage, and failure to adequately repair DSBs would not only compromise the ability of SCs to self-renew and differentiate, but will also lead to genomic instability and disease. SCOPE OF REVIEW: Herein, we describe the mechanisms by which ESCs respond to DSB-inducing agents such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ionizing radiation, compared to somatic cells. We will also discuss whether the DSB response is fully reprogrammed in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and the role of the DNA damage response (DDR) in the reprogramming of these cells. MAJOR
CONCLUSIONS: ESCs have distinct mechanisms to protect themselves against DSBs and oxidative stress compared to somatic cells. The response to damage and stress is crucial for the maintenance of self-renewal and differentiation capacity in SCs. iPSCs appear to reprogram some of the responses to genotoxic stress. However, it remains to be determined if iPSCs also retain some DDR characteristics of the somatic cells of origin. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: The mechanisms regulating the genomic integrity in ESCs and iPSCs are critical for its safe use in regenerative medicine and may shed light on the pathways and factors that maintain genomic stability, preventing diseases such as cancer. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Biochemistry of Stem Cells.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22995214     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  32 in total

1.  DNA damage response in neonatal and adult stromal cells compared with induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Stefanie Liedtke; Sophie Biebernick; Teja Falk Radke; Daniela Stapelkamp; Carolin Coenen; Holm Zaehres; Gerhard Fritz; Gesine Kogler
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 6.940

2.  DNA damage-free iPS cells exhibit potential to yield competent cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Jessica M Miller; Nikhil M Mardhekar; Danielle Pretorius; Prasanna Krishnamurthy; Namakkal Soorappan Rajasekaran; Jianyi Zhang; Ramaswamy Kannappan
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.733

3.  Neutrophil-induced genomic instability impedes resolution of inflammation and wound healing.

Authors:  Veronika Butin-Israeli; Triet M Bui; Hannah L Wiesolek; Lorraine Mascarenhas; Joseph J Lee; Lindsey C Mehl; Kaitlyn R Knutson; Stephen A Adam; Robert D Goldman; Arthur Beyder; Lisa Wiesmuller; Stephen B Hanauer; Ronen Sumagin
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 4.  Pluripotent Stem Cells and DNA Damage Response to Ionizing Radiations.

Authors:  Kalpana Mujoo; E Brian Butler; Raj K Pandita; Clayton R Hunt; Tej K Pandita
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 5.  Balancing self-renewal against genome preservation in stem cells: How do they manage to have the cake and eat it too?

Authors:  Robert Y L Tsai
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 6.  Exploiting the Microhomology-Mediated End-Joining Pathway in Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey Patterson-Fortin; Alan D D'Andrea
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Stemness factor Sall4 is required for DNA damage response in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Jianhua Xiong; Dilyana Todorova; Ning-Yuan Su; Jinchul Kim; Pei-Jen Lee; Zhouxin Shen; Steven P Briggs; Yang Xu
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Cultivation and characterization of primordial germ cells from blue layer hybrids (Araucana crossbreeds) and generation of germline chimeric chickens.

Authors:  Stefanie Altgilbers; Sabine Klein; Claudia Dierks; Steffen Weigend; Wilfried A Kues
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Maintenance of genomic stability in mouse embryonic stem cells: relevance in aging and disease.

Authors:  Claudia Giachino; Luca Orlando; Valentina Turinetto
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  The role of cellular senescence in the gastrointestinal mucosa.

Authors:  Joshua D Penfield; Marlys Anderson; Lori Lutzke; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 4.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.