Ellen Funkhouser1, Bonita S Agee, Valeria V Gordan, D Brad Rindal, Jeffrey L Fellows, Vibeke Qvist, Jocelyn McClelland, Gregg H Gilbert. 1. Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA Department of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA HealthPartners Dental Group, and HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA Department of Cariology and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark General dentistry private practice, Alabaster, AL, USA Department of General Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Estimate the proportion of dental practitioners who use online sources of information for practice guidance. METHODS: From a survey of 657 dental practitioners in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network, four indicators of online use for practice guidance were calculated: read journals online, obtained continuing education (CDE) through online sources, rated an online source as most influential, and reported frequently using an online source for guidance. Demographics, journals read, and use of various sources of information for practice guidance in terms of frequency and influence were ascertained for each. RESULTS: Overall, 21 percent (n = 138) were classified into one of the four indicators of online use: 14 percent (n = 89) rated an online source as most influential and 13 percent (n = 87) reported frequently using an online source for guidance; few practitioners (5 percent, n = 34) read journals online, fewer (3 percent, n = 17) obtained CDE through online sources. Use of online information sources varied considerably by region and practice characteristics. In general, the four indicators represented practitioners with as many differences as similarities to each other and to offline users. CONCLUSION: A relatively small proportion of dental practitioners use information from online sources for practice guidance. Variation exists regarding practitioners' use of online source resources and how they rate the value of offline information sources for practice guidance.
OBJECTIVE: Estimate the proportion of dental practitioners who use online sources of information for practice guidance. METHODS: From a survey of 657 dental practitioners in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network, four indicators of online use for practice guidance were calculated: read journals online, obtained continuing education (CDE) through online sources, rated an online source as most influential, and reported frequently using an online source for guidance. Demographics, journals read, and use of various sources of information for practice guidance in terms of frequency and influence were ascertained for each. RESULTS: Overall, 21 percent (n = 138) were classified into one of the four indicators of online use: 14 percent (n = 89) rated an online source as most influential and 13 percent (n = 87) reported frequently using an online source for guidance; few practitioners (5 percent, n = 34) read journals online, fewer (3 percent, n = 17) obtained CDE through online sources. Use of online information sources varied considerably by region and practice characteristics. In general, the four indicators represented practitioners with as many differences as similarities to each other and to offline users. CONCLUSION: A relatively small proportion of dental practitioners use information from online sources for practice guidance. Variation exists regarding practitioners' use of online source resources and how they rate the value of offline information sources for practice guidance.
Authors: Titus K L Schleyer; Thankam P Thyvalikakath; Heiko Spallek; Miguel H Torres-Urquidy; Pedro Hernandez; Jeannie Yuhaniak Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2006-02-24 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Gregg H Gilbert; O Dale Williams; D Brad Rindal; Daniel J Pihlstrom; Paul L Benjamin; Martha C Wallace Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Ana Miriam Velly; Gary C Anderson; John O Look; Joseph L Riley; D Bradley Rindal; Kimberly Johnson; Qi Wang; James Fricton; Kevin Huff; Richard Ohrbach; Gregg H Gilbert; Eric Schiffman Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2021-12-29 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Kimberley R Isett; Simone Rosenblum; Julie Ann Barna; Diana Hicks; Gregg H Gilbert; Julia Melkers Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Julia Melkers; Diana Hicks; Simone Rosenblum; Kimberley R Isett; Jacqueline Elliott Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 5.428