Literature DB >> 2299455

Recovery of neurosensory function following orthognathic surgery.

N D Karas1, S B Boyd, D P Sinn.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to prospectively define the recovery of touch discrimination following four commonly performed surgical procedures in 22 consecutive patients with no previous maxillofacial surgery. The surgical groups studied were Le Fort I osteotomy (LEFORT; n = 13), sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO; n = 6), intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO; n = 9), and isolated genioplasty (GENIO; n = 5). Neurosensory function was assessed by three different testing modalities which included static light touch (SLT), moving touch discrimination (MTD), and two-point discrimination (TPD). Cutaneous sensation of the lower lip and chin were examined for the mandibular procedures, whereas the infraorbital and upper lip regions were evaluated following maxillary surgery. Immediately following surgery, each group varied in both the incidence and magnitude of neurosensory deficits (NSD). The SSRO group had the highest percentage of sites with immediate postsurgical NSD to both SLT (72%) and MTD (67%), followed by the LEFORT (SLT = 50%, MDT = 58%), GENIO (SLT = 27%, MTD = 6%), and IVRO groups (SLT = 11%, MTD = 18%), respectively. Each group also varied in the severity of the initial postoperative deficit as measured by SLT, with the SSRO group showing the greatest deficit followed by the LEFORT, GENIO, and IVRO groups. During the 6-month recovery period each group approached preoperative levels of sensation at a different rate. The LEFORT group recovered most rapidly, with few anatomic sites showing NSD (SLT = 20%, MTD = 5%) at the 1-month postoperative examination, and the majority of the group (96%) returned to preoperative sensation by 3 months following surgery. The SSRO group recovered more slowly, with approximately half of the group demonstrating a deficit (SLT = 50%, MTD = 59%) at 1 month, which diminished to about one fourth of the sites (SLT = 25%, MTD = 5%) by 3 months. Most of the SSRO group (90%) exhibited no residual deficit 6 months following surgery. The IVRO group had few sites with immediate NSD (SLT = 11%, MTD = 15%). In none of the surgical groups was a statistically significant correlation found between the severity of the initial NSD and length of time to complete recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2299455     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(10)80199-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  11 in total

Review 1.  Sensory retraining: a cognitive behavioral therapy for altered sensation.

Authors:  Ceib Phillips; George Blakey; Greg K Essick
Journal:  Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2011-03

2.  A morphometric analysis of the mandibular canal by cone beam computed tomography and its relevance to the sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Vinícius de Carvalho Machado; Björn Gjelvold
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-02-13

3.  Qualitative descriptors used by patients following orthognathic surgery to portray altered sensation.

Authors:  Ceib Phillips; Greg Essick; John Zuniga; Myron Tucker; George Blakey
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Sensory retraining after orthognathic surgery: effect on patients' perception of altered sensation.

Authors:  Ceib Phillips; Greg Essick; John S Preisser; Timothy A Turvey; Myron Tucker; Dongming Lin
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Effects of lip revision surgery on long-term orosensory function in patients with cleft lip/palate.

Authors:  Greg Essick; Ceib Phillips; Yunro Chung; Carroll-Ann Trotman
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2012-08-20

6.  Functional outcomes of cleft lip surgery. Part I: Study design and surgeon ratings of lip disability and need for lip revision.

Authors:  Carroll-Ann Trotman; Ceib Phillips; Greg K Essick; Julian J Faraway; Steven M Barlow; H Wolfgang Losken; John van Aalst; Lyna Rogers
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2007-11

7.  Evaluation of Post-operative Complication Rate of Le Fort I Osteotomy: A Retrospective and Prospective Study.

Authors:  Sandeep Garg; Supreet Kaur
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-12-14

8.  Post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy. A study of 63 cases.

Authors:  M-A Peñarrocha; D Peñarrocha; J-V Bagán; M Peñarrocha
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-03-01

9.  Neurosensory changes of palatal mucousa following Le Fort I osteotomy.

Authors:  Bijan Movahedian Attar; Navid Farzad Far
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  Risk factors of neurosensory disturbance following orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Albraa Badr Alolayan; Yiu Yan Leung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.