Literature DB >> 22994162

Design of an accuracy study for position detection in football.

Malte Siegle1, Tom Stevens, Martin Lames.   

Abstract

Only a few studies have analysed the accuracy of position detection systems. All of them analysed distances and velocities, which are the outcome of calculations based on x,y positions. The objective of this study was to analyse the accuracy of dynamic x,y position measurement of a radar- and an image-based system in football. One and two runners performed five different runs on four different locations on a football pitch. X,y positions recorded by the radar-based and the image-based system were compared to x,y positions measured by a Laveg laser device. Accuracies were analysed by means of root mean square error (RMSE). Results showed that the radar-based system detects positions more accurately than the image-based system (P = 0.000). Mean RMSE of the radar-based system was 0.24 m, RMSE of the image-based system was 0.73 m. The image-based system was significantly influenced by the location of the run, whereas the radar-based system was not. Based on the results of this study, we conclude that the radar-based system is more valid in detecting x,y positions than the image-based system. Future studies should take advantage of the new test design which allows more precise statements on the accuracy of a position detection system.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22994162     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2012.723131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  14 in total

1.  Low External Workloads Are Related to Higher Injury Risk in Professional Male Basketball Games.

Authors:  Toni Caparrós; Martí Casals; Álvaro Solana; Javier Peña
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Drone-Based Position Detection in Sports-Validation and Applications.

Authors:  Tiago Guedes Russomanno; Patrick Blauberger; Otto Kolbinger; Hilary Lam; Marc Schmid; Martin Lames
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Comparing the activity profiles of wheelchair rugby using a miniaturised data logger and radio-frequency tracking system.

Authors:  Barry Mason; John Lenton; James Rhodes; Rory Cooper; Victoria Goosey-Tolfrey
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Validity and reliability of GPS and LPS for measuring distances covered and sprint mechanical properties in team sports.

Authors:  Matthias W Hoppe; Christian Baumgart; Ted Polglaze; Jürgen Freiwald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Criterion Validity of Catapult ClearSky T6 Local Positioning System for Measuring Inter-Unit Distance.

Authors:  Ryan W Hodder; Kevin A Ball; Fabio R Serpiello
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Can Positioning Systems Replace Timing Gates for Measuring Sprint Time in Ice Hockey?

Authors:  Daniel Link; Marcus Weber; Daniel Linke; Martin Lames
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Seasonal Pacing - Match Importance Affects Activity in Professional Soccer.

Authors:  Daniel Link; Michael F de Lorenzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Validation of electronic performance and tracking systems EPTS under field conditions.

Authors:  Daniel Linke; Daniel Link; Martin Lames
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Match outcome and running performance in different intensity ranges among elite soccer players.

Authors:  Paweł Chmura; Marek Konefał; Jan Chmura; Edward Kowalczuk; Tomasz Zając; Andrzej Rokita; Marcin Andrzejewski
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 2.806

10.  Validity of a Local Positioning System during Outdoor and Indoor Conditions for Team Sports.

Authors:  Prisca S Alt; Christian Baumgart; Olaf Ueberschär; Jürgen Freiwald; Matthias W Hoppe
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.