Literature DB >> 22994018

Attitude and preference of Thai pregnant women towards mode of delivery.

Waralak Yamasmit1, Surasith Chaithongwongwatthana.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the attitudes and wishes of Thai pregnant women regarding modes of delivery. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: Four hundred fifteen pregnant women attending the Vajira Hospital antenatal clinic were included in the present study. Data was assembled from the voluntarily self-completion questionnaires completed by the eligible women.
RESULTS: Only 3.1% of the participants could give entirely correct answers in the knowledge module. Most of the respondents (87.5%) preferred vaginal delivery. The most popular reason for the preference for vaginal delivery was desire for a natural process. Fear of labor pain was the most frequent reason of the women who preferred cesarean section. The strongest predictor for patients' preference for cesarean delivery was a prior cesarean section (RR 11.1, 95% CI 4.7 to 26). Thirty-two percent of the participants felt that cesarean delivery on maternal request was their right and they desired to take part in the decision-making for their mode of delivery. Of those women who stated that cesarean section on demand was their right, the majority (77.3%) still preferred vaginal delivery.
CONCLUSION: Although the proportion of Thai pregnant women who wished to have a cesarean delivery was higher than that of women from other countries, the majority of study participants preferred vaginal delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22994018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai        ISSN: 0125-2208


  5 in total

1.  Intention for Cesarean Section Versus Vaginal Delivery Among Pregnant Women in Isfahan: Correlates and Determinants.

Authors:  Zahra Shams-Ghahfarokhi; Farideh Khalajabadi-Farahani
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

2.  How is women's demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Clémence Schantz; Myriam de Loenzien; Sophie Goyet; Marion Ravit; Aurélien Dancoisne; Alexandre Dumont
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders.

Authors:  Alice Yuen Loke; Louise Davies; Yim-Wah Mak
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Women's cesarean section preferences and influencing factors in relation to China's two-child policy: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Huijuan Liang; Yancun Fan; Nan Zhang; Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong; Qingchun Wang; Jing Gong; Hutcha Sriplung
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Trend of Cesarean Section Rates and Correlations with Adverse Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis of Thai Universal Coverage Scheme Data.

Authors:  Tippawan Liabsuetrakul; Jarawee Sukmanee; Jutatip Thungthong; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2019-10-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.