Literature DB >> 2299395

Local accumulation of acetylcholine receptors is neither necessary nor sufficient to induce cluster formation.

J Stollberg1, S E Fraser.   

Abstract

Acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) accumulate at developing neuromuscular junctions in part via lateral migration of diffusely expressed receptors. Using a model system--cultured Xenopus muscle cells exposed to electric fields--we have shown that AChRs, concentrated at the cathode-facing cell pole, continue to aggregate there after the field is terminated (Stollberg and Fraser, 1988). These observations are consistent with the possibility that the field-induced increase in receptor concentration triggers the aggregation event. Only 2 other molecular events could initiate the electric field-induced receptor aggregation: (1) a local increase in the density of some other molecules, or (2) a voltage-sensitive mechanism. Treatment of muscle cell cultures with neuraminidase changes the cell surface charge and has been reported to reverse the direction of electromigration for AChRs and concanavalin A binding sites (Orida and Poo, 1978). Using digitally analyzed fluorescence videomicroscopy, we find that AChRs in neuraminidase-treated cultures accumulate at both cell poles in an electric field. After termination of the field, the AChR continues to aggregate at the cathode-facing pole, as in cells not treated with neuraminidase. However, receptor density decreases at the anode-facing pole, indicating that elevated AChR density does not initiate receptor aggregation. Cells pretreated with neuraminidase and trypsin (which blocks receptor aggregation) display reversed receptor distributions compared to untreated controls, indicating that electromigration has indeed been reversed. The rate at which neuraminidase- and trypsin-treated cells approach steady-state distributions indicates a receptor diffusion constant of approximately 1.2 x 10(-9) cm2/sec, consistent with a diffusion trap mechanism of receptor aggregation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2299395      PMCID: PMC6570350     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  8 in total

1.  Common molecular mechanisms in field- and agrin-induced acetylcholine receptor clustering.

Authors:  F Sabrina; J Stollberg
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.046

2.  Density and diffusion limited aggregation in membranes.

Authors:  J Stollberg
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  Subnanosecond polarized fluorescence photobleaching: rotational diffusion of acetylcholine receptors on developing muscle cells.

Authors:  Y Yuan; D Axelrod
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Animal models of transcranial direct current stimulation: Methods and mechanisms.

Authors:  Mark P Jackson; Asif Rahman; Belen Lafon; Gregory Kronberg; Doris Ling; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Acetylcholine receptor clustering is triggered by a change in the density of a nonreceptor molecule.

Authors:  J Stollberg; S E Fraser
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Clustering and immobilization of acetylcholine receptors by the 43-kD protein: a possible role for dystrophin-related protein.

Authors:  W D Phillips; P G Noakes; S L Roberds; K P Campbell; J P Merlie
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Evaluation of EGFR and RTK signaling in the electrotaxis of lung adenocarcinoma cells under direct-current electric field stimulation.

Authors:  Hsieh-Fu Tsai; Ching-Wen Huang; Hui-Fang Chang; Jeremy J W Chen; Chau-Hwang Lee; Ji-Yen Cheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A role of tyrosine phosphorylation in the formation of acetylcholine receptor clusters induced by electric fields in cultured Xenopus muscle cells.

Authors:  H B Peng; L P Baker; Z Dai
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 10.539

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.