Literature DB >> 22993720

Discomfort analysis in computerized numeric control machine operations.

Krishnamoorthy Muthukumar1, Krishnasamy Sankaranarayanasamy, Anindya Kumar Ganguli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The introduction of computerized numeric control (CNC) technology in manufacturing industries has revolutionized the production process, but there are some health and safety problems associated with these machines. The present study aimed to investigate the extent of postural discomfort in CNC machine operators, and the relationship of this discomfort to the display and control panel height, with a view to validate the anthropometric recommendation for the location of the display and control panel in CNC machines.
METHODS: The postural discomforts associated with CNC machines were studied in 122 male operators using Corlett and Bishop's body part discomfort mapping, subject information, and discomfort level at various time intervals from starting to end of a shift. This information was collected using a questionnaire. Statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA.
RESULTS: Neck discomfort due to the positioning of the machine displays, and shoulder and arm discomfort due to the positioning of controls were identified as common health issues in the operators of these machines. The study revealed that 45.9% of machine operators reported discomfort in the lower back, 41.8% in the neck, 22.1% in the upper-back, 53.3% in the shoulder and arm, and 21.3% of the operators reported discomfort in the leg.
CONCLUSION: Discomfort increased with the progress of the day and was highest at the end of a shift; subject age had no effect on patient tendency to experience discomfort levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropometry; Computerized numeric control machines; Discomfort; Discomfort mapping; Human engineering; Work-related musculoskeletal disorders

Year:  2012        PMID: 22993720      PMCID: PMC3440464          DOI: 10.5491/SHAW.2012.3.2.146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saf Health Work        ISSN: 2093-7911


  10 in total

1.  Validity of self-reported duration of work postures obtained by interview. MUSIC-Norrtälje Study Group.

Authors:  M Mortimer; E W Hjelm; C Wiktorin; G Pernold; A Kilbom; E Vingård
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Posture, discomfort and performance in a VDT task.

Authors:  M H Liao; C G Drury
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Relationship between comfort and back posture and mobility in sitting-posture.

Authors:  Margarita Vergara; Alvaro Page
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  An integrated analysis of ergonomics and time consumption in Swedish 'craft-type' car disassembly.

Authors:  Karolina Kazmierczak; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Mikael Forsman; Jørgen Winkel
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Work posture, workstation design, and musculoskeletal discomfort in a VDT data entry task.

Authors:  S L Sauter; L M Schleifer; S J Knutson
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  A technique for assessing postural discomfort.

Authors:  E N Corlett; R P Bishop
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Does risk perception affect behaviour and exposure? A pilot study amongst asbestos workers.

Authors:  A J Stewart-Taylor; J W Cherrie
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  1998-11

8.  The impact of keyboard design on comfort and productivity in a text-entry task.

Authors:  N G Swanson; T L Galinsky; L L Cole; C S Pan; S L Sauter
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.661

9.  Musculoskeletal disorders among male sewing machine operators in shoemaking.

Authors:  J N Serratos-Perez; C Mendiola-Anda
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Work stress of women in sewing machine operation.

Authors:  A Nag; H Desai; P K Nag
Journal:  J Hum Ergol (Tokyo)       Date:  1992-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.