| Literature DB >> 22993696 |
Jiro Harada1, Tadashi Mizoguchi, Yusuke Tsukatani, Masato Noguchi, Hitoshi Tamiaki.
Abstract
The discovery of new chlorophyllous pigments would provide greater understanding of the mechanisms and evolution of photosynthesis. Bacteriochlorophyll f has never been observed in nature, although this name was proposed ~40 years ago based on structurally related compounds. We constructed a bacteriochlorophyll f-accumulating mutant of the green sulfur bacterium Chlorobaculum limnaeum, which originally produced bacteriochlorophyll e, by knocking out the bchU gene encoding C-20 methyltransferase based on natural transformation. This novel pigment self-aggregates in an in vivo light-harvesting antenna, the chlorosome, and exhibits a Q(y) peak of 705 nm, more blue-shifted than any other chlorosome reported so far; the peak overlaps the maximum (~700 nm) of the solar photon flux spectrum. Bacteriochlorophyll f chlorosomes can transfer light energy from core aggregated pigments to another bacteriochlorophyll in the chlorosomal envelope across an energy gap of ~100 nm, and is thus a promising material for development of new bioenergy applications.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22993696 PMCID: PMC3445912 DOI: 10.1038/srep00671
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Determination of compositions of BChl f homologs in C. limnaeum bchU mutant.
(a) HPLC elution profiles of extracted pigments from the C. limnaeum wildtype (upper panel) and bchU mutant cells (bottom panel). The elution of pigments was detected at 455 nm. Peak 1, R[E,E]BChl e; peak 2, S[E,E]BChl e; peak 3, R[P,E]BChl e; peak 4, S[P,E]BChl e; peak 5, S[I,E]BChl e; Peak 6, R[E,E]BChl f; peak 7, R[P,E]BChl f; peak 8, S[P,E]BChl f; peak 9, S[I,E]BChl f. (b) UV-Vis absorption (upper) and CD (bottom) spectra of R[E,E]BChl f in diethyl ether. (c) Chemical structure of BChl f, with comparison to other chlorosomal BChls.
Figure 2UV-Vis-NIR absorption (a) and CD (b) spectra of the cells of C. limnaeum wildtype (broken lines) and bchU mutant (solid lines).
Panel (a) inset shows fluorescence emission spectra of the cells excited at the redmost Soret maxima.
Comparison of growth rates between C. limnaeum wildtype and bchU mutant under different light-illuminated conditions
| Light intensity (μE·s−1·m−2) | Strain | Growth rate (h−1) [relative value] | Doubling time (h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | wildtype | 0.033 ± 0.001 [1] | 21.1 |
| 0.023 ± 0.000 [0.79] | 30.7 | ||
| 30 | wildtype | 0.102 ± 0.007 [1] | 6.8 |
| 0.070 ± 0.003 [0.69] | 9.9 | ||
| 130 | wildtype | 0.095 ± 0.008 [1] | 7.3 |
| 0.076 ± 0.000 [0.78] | 9.2 |