Literature DB >> 22993490

Evaluation of anaesthesia methods in caesarean section for foetal distress.

Sri Wahjoeningsih1, Widowati Witjaksono.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anaesthetic technique for Caesarean section which was appropriate for the clinical situation. This retrospective study was conducted on 240 patients undergoing Caesarean section with indications of foetal distress during a 3-year period (2002-2004). The data were reviewed from the patient's medical record of the Department of Anesthesiology, Dr Soetomo Hospital, Surabaya. The patients were divided into three groups, according to the criteria of foetal heart rates. The success of the anaesthesia methods was determined by assessing the Apgar scores of the newborn baby. The results were analyse using Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-Square test. P ≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant. 1- and 5-minute Apgar score of the normal range group was significantly higher than that of the bradycardia group (p<0.05), but no significant differences was found between the normal range and the tachycardia group (p>0.05). One- and five- minute Apgar scores of the sub-arachnoid block group were significantly higher than those of the general anesthesia group (p<0.05). One-minute Apgar score of the ketamine group was significantly higher than that of the thiopental group (p<0.05), but no significant differences in 5-minute Apgar score was found between the ketamine and the thiopental groups (p>0.05). We conclude that subarachnoid block is the choice of anaesthesia for patients undergoing Caesarean section for foetal distress's diagnosed at PS 1 and 2 patients. General anaesthesia with ketamine Apgar score at one minute better than that of the thiopental.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean section; Obstetric anaesthesia; emergency; foetal distress

Year:  2007        PMID: 22993490      PMCID: PMC3442625     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Malays J Med Sci        ISSN: 1394-195X


  3 in total

1.  Caesarean section for fetal distress.

Authors:  D James
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-02

Review 2.  Anesthesia for the repeat cesarean section in the parturient with abnormal placentation: what does an obstetrician need to know?

Authors:  Krzysztof M Kuczkowski
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification.

Authors:  D N Lucas; S M Yentis; S M Kinsella; A Holdcroft; A E May; M Wee; P N Robinson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.344

  3 in total
  2 in total

1.  General versus regional anaesthesia for caesarean section indicated for acute foetal distress: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Junette Arlette Mbengono Metogo; Theophile Njamen Nana; Brian Ajong Ngongheh; Emelinda Berinyuy Nyuydzefon; Christoph Akazong Adjahoung; Joel Noutakdie Tochie; Jacqueline Ze Minkande
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.217

2.  Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in pregnant women with fetal distress: time for reappraisal.

Authors:  J M Afolayan; T O Olajumoke; S E Esangbedo; N P Edomwonyi
Journal:  Int J Biomed Sci       Date:  2014-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.