| Literature DB >> 22992429 |
Jung Eun Lee1, Chin-Ok Yi, Byeong Tak Jeon, Hyun Joo Shin, Soo Kyoung Kim, Tae Sik Jung, Jun Young Choi, Gu Seob Roh.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia leads to cardiac oxidative stress and an imbalance in glucose homeostasis. Diabetic cardiomyopathy is characterised by cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. However, the underlying mechanisms of diabetic cardiomyopathy are not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the effects of alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) on cardiac energy metabolism, antioxidant effect, and fibrosis in the hearts of Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima fatty (OLETF) rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22992429 PMCID: PMC3558371 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-11-111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Body and heart weight in OLETF rats with or without ALA treatment
| 538.55 ± 8.63 | 636.40 ± 15.55* | 518.54 ± 14.92† | |
| 1.36 ± 0.03 | 1.52 ± 0.02* | 1.43 ± 0.03† | |
| 2.73 ± 0.05 | 2.52 ± 0.09* | 3.05 ± 0.05† |
Significance: *P < 0.05. vs. LETO rats, †P < 0.05. vs. OLETF rats.
Figure 1Effect of ALA on the cardiac AMPK signalling pathway in OLETF rats. (A) Representative Western blots of LKB1. Quantification of cardiac LKB1 by Western blot analysis. (B) Western blot showing total (T) and phosphorylated (p) forms of AMPK and ACC in the hearts from each group. Quantification of the phosphorylation of each protein on Western blots. The densitometry value for each phospho-protein was normalized against total protein and the values are presented as arbitrary units (A.U.). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. LETO rats; †p < 0.05 vs. OLETF rats. (C) A Western blot showing the level of cardiac SREBP1 in each group. The total, cytosolic, and nuclear lysates were prepared from heart tissues. a-tubulin and lamin A were used as the control to verify identical protein loading. (D) A western blot showing the level of cardiac GLUT4 in each group. The total lysate, plasma membrane, and post-plasma membrane fraction were prepared from heart tissues. a-tubulin and Ponceau S dye staining was used as the control to verify identical protein loading.
Figure 2Effect of ALA on cardiac RAGE expression in OLETF rats. (A) Western blot showing the level of cardiac RAGE in each group. (B) Quantification of cardiac RAGE by Western blot analysis. Densitometry values of RAGE protein were normalized to that of α-tubulin and are presented as arbitrary units (A.U.) relative to LETO expression levels. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. LETO rats; †p < 0.05 vs. OLETF rats.
Figure 3Effect of ALA on cardiac HO-1 and Cu/Zn-SOD expression in OLETF rats. (A) Western blot showing the level of cardiac HO-1 in each group. Quantification of cardiac HO-1 by Western blot analysis. (B) Western blot showing the level of cardiac Cu/Zn-SOD in each group. Quantification of cardiac Cu/Zn-SOD by Western blot analysis. The densitometry value of each protein was normalized to that of α-tubulin and the values are presented as arbitrary units (A.U.) relative to LETO expression levels. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. LETO rats; †p < 0.05 vs. OLETF rats. (C) Representative micrographs of immunostained cardiac Cu/Zn-SOD in each group. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 4Effect of ALA on cardiac collagen deposition in OLETF rats. Representative micrographs of H&E-stained (A) and Sirius red-stained (B) heart sections from each group. The black lined-box (in B) shows a high-magnification micrograph (C) of Sirius red-stained sections. Scale bar = 1000 μm (200 μm in C). (D) Sircol collagen assay quantifying soluble collagen in the hearts of LETO and OLETF rats with or without ALA. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. LETO rats; †p < 0.05 vs. OLETF rats.
Figure 5Effect of ALA on cardiac TGF-β1 and CTGF expression in OLETF rats. (A) A Western blot showing the level of cardiac TGF-β1 in each group. (B) Quantification of cardiac TGF-β1 by Western blot analysis. The densitometry value of each protein was normalized to that of α-tubulin and the values are presented as arbitrary units (A.U.) relative to LETO expression levels. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05 vs. LETO rats; †p < 0.05 vs. OLETF rats. (C) Representative micrographs of immunostained CTGF in the hearts from each group. Scale bar = 100 μm.