Literature DB >> 22991236

Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration and imaging in the preoperative workup of salivary gland mass lesions treated surgically.

Geir Tryggvason1, Michael P Gailey, Stephanie L Hulstein, Lucy H Karnell, Henry T Hoffman, Gerry F Funk, Chris S Jensen, Douglas J Van Daele.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy and imaging are commonly used in the preoperative assessment of salivary gland mass lesions. The goal of this retrospective study was to clarify the role of FNA and imaging in the workup of salivary gland masses. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: A computer search identified patients with an FNA of a salivary gland lesion with subsequent excision during a 10-year study period. Chart review of study patients was performed, and information on site of lesion, age, gender, radiologic diagnosis, pain in the tumor area, and facial paralysis was recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS: There were 543 patients who had an FNA and subsequent histopathology. The majority of the tumors were in the parotid gland (n = 492, 90.9%), followed by submandibular gland (n = 45, 8.3%). The incidence of malignancy across all sites was 29.7%. The mean patient age was 54.1 years, and 54.1% were female. The sensitivity and specificity of FNA were 85.7% and 99.5%, respectively. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 98.6%, and negative predictive value (NPV) was 94.3%. A total of 464 patients had available radiologic studies. For the radiological diagnoses, sensitivity was 81.8% and specificity was 67.3%, whereas PPV and NPV were 52.7% and 89.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: FNA is a reliable method of preoperatively assessing both benign and malignant salivary gland lesions. Preoperative imaging has a lower sensitivity and specificity than FNA in differentiating malignant from benign tumors. Older age, pain, and facial paralysis are clinical features independently associated with malignancy.
Copyright © 2012 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22991236     DOI: 10.1002/lary.23613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  9 in total

1.  Fine needle aspiration cytology for parotid neoplasms: risk of malignancy through inconclusive results and lower grade tumors.

Authors:  Andrea Galli; Michele Tulli; Leone Giordano; Matteo Biafora; Davide Di Santo; Stefano Bondi; Lucia Oriella Piccioni; Mario Bussi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differential diagnosis of submandibular gland disease.

Authors:  Sebastian Strieth; Vanessa Siedek; Margarita Rytvina; Robert Gürkov; Alexander Berghaus; Dirk-André Clevert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Diagnostic dilemma of parotid lipomas: imaging versus fine needle aspiration cytology.

Authors:  Ilker Burak Arslan; Sinan Uluyol; Selahattin Genc; Tugrul Eruyar; Suphi Bulgurcu; Ibrahim Cukurova
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.363

4.  Is the combined use of ultrasonography (USG) and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) safe in parotis masses? Retrospective comprehensive comparison of 123 cases.

Authors:  Erkan Yıldız; Selçuk Kuzu; Çağlar Günebakan; Murat Özdemir; Abdulkadir Bucak; Orhan Kemal Kahveci
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Is DOG1 really useful in the diagnosis of salivary gland acinic cell carcinoma? - A DOG1 (clone K9) analysis in fine needle aspiration cell blocks and the review of the literature.

Authors:  Sule Canberk; Mine Onenerk; Elif Sayman; Ceren Canbey Goret; Murat Erkan; Tugba Atasoy; Gamze Z Kilicoglu
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.091

6.  New insight into benign tumours of major salivary glands by proteomic approach.

Authors:  Elena Donadio; Laura Giusti; Veronica Seccia; Federica Ciregia; Ylenia da Valle; Iacopo Dallan; Tiziana Ventroni; Gino Giannaccini; Stefano Sellari-Franceschini; Antonio Lucacchini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Accuracy of Core Needle Biopsy Versus Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology for Diagnosing Salivary Gland Tumors.

Authors:  In Hye Song; Joon Seon Song; Chang Ohk Sung; Jong-Lyel Roh; Seung-Ho Choi; Soon Yuhl Nam; Sang Yoon Kim; Jeong Hyun Lee; Jung Hwan Baek; Kyung-Ja Cho
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2015-03-12

8.  Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Salivary Gland Tumors Before the Milan System: Ten Years of Experience at a Tertiary Care Center in Turkey.

Authors:  Selcuk Yildiz; Lutfu Seneldir; Cigdem Tepe Karaca; Sema Zer Toros
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2021-09-30

Review 9.  Parotid gland tumors: a retrospective study of 154 patients.

Authors:  Gerson Schulz Maahs; Paula de Oliveira Oppermann; Lucas Gerhard Peter Maahs; Geraldo Machado Filho; André Dajori Ronchi
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.