Literature DB >> 2299083

Time dependence of ventricular refractory periods: implications for electrophysiologic protocols.

R E Strobel1, J D Fisher, G Katz, S G Kim, A D Mercando.   

Abstract

Cardiac refractory periods are routinely measured during electrophysiologic testing. Informal observations suggested that the effective refractory period lengthened with a prolongation of the time in sinus rhythm (basic cycle length time) between successive runs of drive stimuli (S1S1s). If this were true, failure to control the basic cycle length time could affect the results and interpretation of electrophysiologic testing. To study this phenomenon, the effective refractory period was studied in 20 patients during sinus rhythm and two ventricular paced rates with up to three extrastimuli, while varying the basic cycle length time from 2 to 3, to 10 to 20 s. With each of the stimulation sequences used, the effective refractory period lengthened as the basic cycle length time increased ("basic cycle length time-effective refractory period effect"). The effect was most pronounced when extrastimuli were used during the two ventricular paced rates. As the basic cycle length time increased from 2 to 3 to 20 s, the mean effective refractory period determined during sinus rhythm increased from 296 to 300 ms; with the first ventricular paced rate, the effective refractory period increased from 259 to 272 ms (p less than 0.0003) and with the second ventricular paced rate, the effective refractory period increased from 250 to 263 ms (p less than 0.01). The basic cycle length time-effective refractory period effect became more pronounced as the number of extrastimuli increased. With the second ventricular paced rate, as basic cycle length was increased from 2 to 3 to 20 s, the mean prolongation in the cumulative effective refractory period (S1 to final extrastimulus) as the number of extrastimuli increased from 1 to 2 to 3, was 13 (p less than 0.01), 42 (p less than 0.0003) and 82 ms (p less than 0.001), respectively. Results were confirmed in 17 instances by redetermining the effective refractory period at the 2 to 3 s basic cycle length time after the final 20 s basic cycle length time determination, and demonstrating that it was similar to the effective refractory period after the initial 2 to 3 s basic cycle length time. No further prolongation of the effective refractory period could be demonstrated by increasing basic cycle length time from 20 to 60 s, and no significant effect of medications on the basic cycle length time-effective refractory period effect could be demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2299083     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80069-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  2 in total

1.  A Real-Time PPG Peak Detection Method for Accurate Determination of Heart Rate during Sinus Rhythm and Cardiac Arrhythmia.

Authors:  Dong Han; Syed Khairul Bashar; Jesús Lázaro; Fahimeh Mohagheghian; Andrew Peitzsch; Nishat Nishita; Eric Ding; Emily L Dickson; Danielle DiMezza; Jessica Scott; Cody Whitcomb; Timothy P Fitzgibbons; David D McManus; Ki H Chon
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29

2.  An Energy efficient application specific integrated circuit for electrocardiogram feature detection and its potential for ambulatory cardiovascular disease detection.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kumar Jain; Basabi Bhaumik
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2016-01-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.