Literature DB >> 22990174

Evaluating sterile human acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study.

Mark L Venturi1, Ali N Mesbahi, James H Boehmler, Aizen J Marrogi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human acellular dermal matrices have gained increasing use in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction. However, some studies suggest that these grafts may be associated with a higher incidence of infection and seroma. To evaluate complication rates after matrix-based breast reconstruction, the authors conducted a prospective, multicenter, cohort study to evaluate a sterile human acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction, specifically, to determine whether it offered a more favorable risk profile with respect to infection and seroma. A secondary purpose was to determine whether the sterilization process affects graft incorporation.
METHODS: The authors performed 65 consecutive tissue expander-based breast reconstructions in a cohort of patients over a 1-year period using a single protocol. Sterile human matrix was used in all cases. The patients were evaluated for early complications (infection, seroma) and graft incorporation at the time of exchange or definitive reconstruction. Biopsies were performed in the first 20 reconstructions to provide histologic correlation of graft incorporation.
RESULTS: Complications occurred in three breasts (4.6 percent), including one case of cellulitis (1.5 percent) and two cases of partial mastectomy flap necrosis (3.0 percent) that required débridement. There were no seromas or explantations. The grafts were incorporated in all cases and verified histologically in the first 20 biopsies.
CONCLUSIONS: Sterile human acellular dermal matrix can offer reliable matrix incorporation and a low complication rate. Sterilization does not negatively impact incorporation of the graft. The infection and seroma rates in this prospective study compare favorably to those in previous studies with nonsterilized (aseptic) acellular dermal matrix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22990174     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182729d4f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  18 in total

Review 1.  Alloplastic adjuncts in breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Miguel S Cabalag; Marie Rostek; George S Miller; Michael P Chae; Tam Quinn; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

Review 2.  Breast reconstruction following prophylactic or therapeutic mastectomy for breast cancer: Recommendations from an evidence-based provincial guideline.

Authors:  Melissa Shea-Budgell; May Lynn Quan; Blair Mehling; Claire Temple-Oberle
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.947

3.  DermACELL Acellular Dermal Matrix in Oncologic Breast Reconstruction: A Cohort Study and Systematic Review.

Authors:  Austin R Swisher; Mark J Landau; Nikita Kadakia; Stephanie W Holzmer; Hahns Y Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-06-20

4.  Evaluating the effectiveness of cryopreserved acellular dermal matrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction: a comparison study.

Authors:  So-Young Kim; So Young Lim; Goo-Hyun Mun; Sa-Ik Bang; Kap Sung Oh; Jai-Kyong Pyon
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-05-14

5.  Tissue Reinforcement in Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael Scheflan; Amy S Colwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-09-08

Review 6.  Acellular dermal matrices and radiotherapy in breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Luigi Valdatta; Anna Giulia Cattaneo; Igor Pellegatta; Stefano Scamoni; Anna Minuti; Mario Cherubino
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2014-05-21

Review 7.  Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: a literature review.

Authors:  Hugh Logan Ellis; Oluwatosin Asaolu; Vivien Nebo; Abdul Kasem
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Is Sterile Better Than Aseptic? Comparing the Microbiology of Acellular Dermal Matrices.

Authors:  Gabriel M Klein; Ahmed E Nasser; Brett T Phillips; Robert P Gersch; Mitchell S Fourman; Sarit E Lilo; Jason R Fritz; Sami U Khan; Alexander B Dagum; Duc T Bui
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-06-28

9.  Aseptic versus Sterile Acellular Dermal Matrices in Breast Reconstruction: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Daniel A Lyons; Shaun D Mendenhall; Michael W Neumeister; Paul S Cederna; Adeyiza O Momoh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-22

10.  The Effect of Sterile Acellular Dermal Matrix Use on Complication Rates in Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstructions.

Authors:  Jun Ho Lee; Youngsoo Park; Kyoung Wook Choi; Kyu-Jin Chung; Tae Gon Kim; Yong-Ha Kim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2016-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.