Literature DB >> 22990062

Bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate causes deeper coagulation depth and less bleeding than monopolar transurethral prostatectomy.

Xing Huang1, Lei Wang, Xing-Huan Wang, Hong-Bo Shi, Xue-Jun Zhang, Zhi-Yun Yu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the hemostatic capability of mono- and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate by comparing the perioperative blood loss with the coagulation depth achieved with mono- and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate.
METHODS: A total of 136 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomized to undergo transurethral resection of the prostate using either a monopolar system (Karl Storz, Co., Tuttlingen, Germany) or a gyrus PlasmaKinetic bipolar system (Gyrus-ACMI Corporation, Maple Grove, MN). The operative time, resected tissue weight, decline in serum sodium and hemoglobin, postoperative bleeding, and the coagulation depth were compared.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in operative time, resected tissue weight, and capsular perforation. The decline in hemoglobin and serum sodium was 1.15 ± 0.53 g/dL and 4.57 ± 0.71 mmol/L in monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate group, respectively, whereas they fell only 0.71 ± 0.42 g/dL and 2.02 ± 0.53 mmol/L in the bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate group, respectively (P <.001). The rate of postoperative bleeding was significantly higher in the monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate group (P = .027). The coagulation depths with mono- and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate were 127.56 ± 27.76 and 148.48 ± 31.64 μm, respectively (P <.001).
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate causes less intraoperative hemoglobin drop and postoperative bleeding than monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate, which may be associated with the deeper coagulation depth of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22990062     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

Review 1.  Bipolar transurethral resection versus monopolar transurethral resection for benign prostatic hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yin Tang; Jinhong Li; Chuanxiao Pu; YunJin Bai; HaiChao Yuan; Qiang Wei; Ping Han
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Five-Year Follow-Up Study of Transurethral Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Yangyang Hu; Xuecheng Dong; Guangchun Wang; Jianhua Huang; Min Liu; Bo Peng
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Plasmakinetic vaporization versus plasmakinetic resection to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia: A prospective randomized trial with 1 year follow-up.

Authors:  Mert Ali Karadag; Kursat Cecen; Aslan Demir; Ramazan Kocaaslan; Fatih Altunrende
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Cost Effectiveness of Photoselective Vaporization with Bipolar Vaporization of Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

Authors:  Priyanka Rai; Alok Srivastava; Ishwar R Dhayal; Sanjeet Singh
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2017-12-30

Review 5.  Plasmakinetic resection technology for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Joey S W Kwong; Xian-Tao Zeng; Xiao-Lan Ruan; Tong-Zu Liu; Hong Weng; Yi Guo; Chang Xu; Jin-Zhu Yan; Xiang-Yu Meng; Xing-Huan Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate is a reliable minimal invasive technique for benign prostate hyperplasia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Yao Li; Jing-Fei Teng; Hai-Yong Zhou; Dan-Feng Xu; Yi Fan
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Urethral strictures after bipolar transurethral resection of prostate may be linked to slow resection rate.

Authors:  Guan Hee Tan; Shamsul Azhar Shah; Nurayub Md Ali; Eng Hong Goh; Praveen Singam; Christopher Chee Kong Ho; Zulkifli Md Zainuddin
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-04-05

8.  Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction.

Authors:  Cameron Edwin Alexander; Malo Mf Scullion; Muhammad Imran Omar; Yuhong Yuan; Charalampos Mamoulakis; James Mo N'Dow; Changhao Chen; Thomas Bl Lam
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-03

9.  A Prospective Study of Bipolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate Comparing the Efficiency and Safety of the Method in Large and Small Adenomas.

Authors:  Nikolaos Mertziotis; Diomidis Kozyrakis; Christos Kyratsas; Andreas Konandreas
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2015-12-07

Review 10.  Risk of acute myocardial infarction after transurethral resection of prostate in elderly.

Authors:  Claudio de Lucia; Grazia Daniela Femminella; Giuseppe Rengo; Antonio Ruffo; Valentina Parisi; Gennaro Pagano; Daniela Liccardo; Alessandro Cannavo; Paola Iacotucci; Klara Komici; Carmela Zincarelli; Carlo Rengo; Pasquale Perrone-Filardi; Dario Leosco; Fabrizio Iacono; Giuseppe Romeo; Bruno Amato; Nicola Ferrara
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.