Literature DB >> 22989856

Evaluating and improving orphan drug regulations in Europe: a Delphi policy study.

Eline Picavet1, David Cassiman, Steven Simoens.   

Abstract

To encourage the development of orphan drugs, the European Union has implemented specific policies in 2000. However, the political, social, scientific and economic context has changed since the implementation of these policies. For that reason, the aim of this article is to evaluate orphan drug policies in Europe. Firstly, key issues on the orphan drug policy were identified based on desk research. Secondly, a Delphi policy study with 47 European orphan drug experts from different backgrounds was carried out to explore these issues. In the round one of the Delphi, responses were received from 18 experts (38.3%) and from ten (55.5%) in the round two. Experts agree that the orphan drug policies in Europe have not outlived their usefulness. Additionally, the importance of reducing country-dependent inequalities in patient access to orphan drugs has been emphasized. Still, there is room for further refinement of the orphan drug policies. Within that context, we formulated several policy recommendations (e.g. enforcing the policy that is in place to reduce the period of market exclusivity for profitable orphan drugs, stating the level of clinical evidence needed to authorize orphan drugs, etc.) with the overall goal to optimize patient access to orphan drugs.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22989856     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  5 in total

1.  Oncologist Perspectives on Rare Cancer Care: A Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Dong Wook Shin; Juhee Cho; Hyung Kook Yang; So Young Kim; Su Hyun Lee; Beomseok Suh; Hee-Young Shin; Hyun Joo Lee; Dae Ghon Kim; Jong Hyock Park
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 4.679

2.  Value-based reimbursement decisions for orphan drugs: a scoping review and decision framework.

Authors:  Mike Paulden; Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Christopher McCabe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Application of orphan drug designation to cancer treatments (2008-2017): a comprehensive and comparative analysis of the USA and EU.

Authors:  Kerstin Noëlle Vokinger; Aaron S Kesselheim
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Stakeholder perceptions of non-regulatory bovine health issues in Ireland: past and future perspectives.

Authors:  Natascha V Meunier; Kenneth McKenzie; David A Graham; Simon J More
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.146

Review 5.  Access to Orphan Drugs: A Comprehensive Review of Legislations, Regulations and Policies in 35 Countries.

Authors:  Todd Gammie; Christine Y Lu; Zaheer Ud-Din Babar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.