Literature DB >> 22989795

The impact of enrollment in clinical trials on survival of patients with glioblastoma.

Tal Shahar1, Erez Nossek, David M Steinberg, Uri Rozovski, Deborah T Blumenthal, Felix Bokstein, Razi Sitt, Sigal Freedman, Benjamin W Corn, Andrew A Kanner, Zvi Ram.   

Abstract

The impact of enrollment in a clinical study on the survival of patients with glioblastoma has not been established. We retrospectively analyzed 564 patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated between 1995 and 2008. They were divided into those enrolled in a clinical trial and randomized to a treatment or control arm, and those not enrolled and who received best standard of care (BSC). The three groups were matched for age and Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) score at presentation, and included only patients who underwent at least one tumor resection. Survival analysis was performed and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) identified predictors of survival. Following the matching process, 261 patients remained to form the final cohort. Of the 124 patients enrolled in a study, 81 (31.0%) were randomized to the treatment and 43 (16.5%) to the control arms. The overall median survival for the BSC (n=137), control, and treatment groups was 11.57 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.41-12.73), 16.27 months (95% CI, 14.10-18.43) and 16.10 months (95% CI, 14.34-17.86), respectively (p=0.002). Participation in a clinical trial, regardless of the arm, was a significant predictor of survival, as were age and KPS at diagnosis. The RPA also demonstrated a favorable impact of participation in a clinical trial. Additional tumor resections and various treatment modalities were administered with significantly higher frequency among patients enrolled in clinical studies. Thus, enrollment in a clinical study carried a significant survival advantage for patients with glioblastoma, raising practical and ethical issues regarding the quality of care of patients who receive "standard" therapy.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22989795     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  19 in total

Review 1.  Biomarker-based adaptive trials for patients with glioblastoma--lessons from I-SPY 2.

Authors:  Brian M Alexander; Patrick Y Wen; Lorenzo Trippa; David A Reardon; Wai-Kwan Alfred Yung; Giovanni Parmigiani; Donald A Berry
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  The development of dendritic cell vaccine-based immunotherapies for glioblastoma.

Authors:  David A Reardon; Duane A Mitchell
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 9.623

3.  Factors associated with enrolment in clinical trials among women with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  D Presti; J Havas; D Soldato; P Lapidari; E Martin; B Pistilli; C Jouannaud; G Emile; O Rigal; M Fournier; P Soulie; M-A Mouret-Reynier; C Tarpin; M Campone; S Guillermet; A-L Martin; S Everhard; A Di Meglio
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2022-06-17

4.  Clinical utility of targeted next-generation sequencing assay in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma for therapy decision-making.

Authors:  Mary Jane Lim-Fat; Gilbert C Youssef; Mehdi Touat; J Bryan Iorgulescu; Sydney Whorral; Marie Allen; Rifaquat Rahman; Ugonma Chukwueke; J Ricardo McFaline-Figueroa; Lakshmi Nayak; Eudocia Q Lee; Tracy T Batchelor; Omar Arnaout; Pier Paolo Peruzzi; E Antonio Chiocca; David A Reardon; David Meredith; Sandro Santagata; Rameen Beroukhim; Wenya Linda Bi; Keith L Ligon; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 13.029

5.  Long-term survivors of glioblastoma: a closer look.

Authors:  Lucy Gately; Sue-Anne McLachlan; Jennifer Philip; Jeremy Ruben; Anthony Dowling
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Glioblastoma management in the temozolomide era: have we improved outcome?

Authors:  Zarnie Lwin; Derek MacFadden; Ahmed Al-Zahrani; Eshetu Atenafu; Barbara Ann Miller; Arjun Sahgal; Cynthia Menard; Normand Laperriere; Warren P Mason
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-08-25       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma cells occurs partly through epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated induction of connexin 43.

Authors:  J L Munoz; V Rodriguez-Cruz; S J Greco; S H Ramkissoon; K L Ligon; P Rameshwar
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 8.469

8.  Compliance with reporting guidelines by Australian pathologists: an audit of the quality of histopathology reporting in high-grade glioma.

Authors:  Alison White; Vicki Fabian; Kerrie McDonald; Anna K Nowak
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2015-08-26

9.  Temozolomide Resistance in Glioblastoma Cell Lines: Implication of MGMT, MMR, P-Glycoprotein and CD133 Expression.

Authors:  Gloria Perazzoli; Jose Prados; Raul Ortiz; Octavio Caba; Laura Cabeza; Maria Berdasco; Beatriz Gónzalez; Consolación Melguizo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Adult neurogenesis and glial oncogenesis: when the process fails.

Authors:  Chary Marquez Batista; Eric Domingos Mariano; Breno José Alencar Pires Barbosa; Matthias Morgalla; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Guilherme Lepski
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.