Literature DB >> 22989000

A two-question method for assessing gender categories in the social and medical sciences.

Charlotte Chuck Tate1, Jay N Ledbetter, Cris P Youssef.   

Abstract

Three studies (N = 990) assessed the statistical reliability of two methods of determining gender identity that can capture transgender spectrum identities (i.e., current gender identities different from birth-assigned gender categories). Study 1 evaluated a single question with four response options (female, male, transgender, other) on university students. The missing data rate was higher than the valid response rates for transgender and other options using this method. Study 2 evaluated a method of asking two separate questions (i.e., one for current identity and another for birth-assigned category), with response options specific to each. Results showed no missing data and two times the transgender spectrum response rate compared to Study 1. Study 3 showed that the two-question method also worked in community samples, producing near-zero missing data. The two-question method also identified cisgender identities (same birth-assigned and current gender identity), making it a dynamic and desirable measurement tool for the social and medical sciences.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22989000     DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2012.690110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Res        ISSN: 0022-4499


  72 in total

1.  Perspectives from Transgender and Gender Diverse People on How to Ask About Gender.

Authors:  Jae A Puckett; Nina C Brown; Terra Dunn; Brian Mustanski; Michael E Newcomb
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.151

2.  Substance Use to Cope with Stigma in Healthcare Among U.S. Female-to-Male Trans Masculine Adults.

Authors:  Sari L Reisner; Seth T Pardo; Kristi E Gamarel; Jaclyn M White Hughto; Dana J Pardee; Colton L Keo-Meier
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.151

3.  The Time Is Now: Attention Increases to Transgender Health in the United States but Scientific Knowledge Gaps Remain.

Authors:  Sarah MacCarthy; Sari L Reisner; Amy Nunn; Amaya Perez-Brumer; Don Operario
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 4.151

4.  Considerations on Sampling in Transgender Health Disparities Research.

Authors:  Emmett R Henderson; John R Blosnich; Jody L Herman; Ilan H Meyer
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.151

5.  Transgender Population Size in the United States: a Meta-Regression of Population-Based Probability Samples.

Authors:  Esther L Meerwijk; Jae M Sevelius
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  A Descriptive Study of Transgender Active Duty Service Members in the U.S. Military.

Authors:  Natasha A Schvey; David A Klein; Arielle T Pearlman; David S Riggs
Journal:  Transgend Health       Date:  2020-09-02

7.  "Doing Difference" and Fast Food Consumption: Patterns Among a Sample of White and African American Emerging Adults.

Authors:  Jeannette M Wade
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-06-22

Review 8.  Measuring Sexual and Gender Minority Populations in Health Surveillance.

Authors:  Joanne G Patterson; Jennifer M Jabson; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.151

9.  Research funded by the National Institutes of Health on the health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations.

Authors:  Robert W S Coulter; Karey S Kenst; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Missing data in substance abuse research? Researchers' reporting practices of sexual orientation and gender identity.

Authors:  Annesa Flentje; Cristina L Bacca; Bryan N Cochran
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.