| Literature DB >> 22988542 |
Nikolaos Kafkas1, Christos Demponeras, Filitsa Zoubouloglou, Loukia Spanou, Dimitrios Babalis, Konstantinos Makris.
Abstract
Background. Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease and the acute clinical manifestations represent acute on chronic inflammation. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is found in the granules of human neutrophils, with many diverse functions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that levels NGAL in blood may reflect the inflammatory process in various stages of coronary artery disease. Methods. We studied 140 patients, with SA 40, UA 35, NSTEMI 40, and STEMI 25, and 20 healthy controls. Serum NGAL was measured upon admission and before coronary angiography. Results. Significant differences were observed in median serum-NGAL(ng/mL) between patients with SA (79.23 (IQR, 37.50-100.32)), when compared with UA (108.00 (68.34-177.59)), NSTEMI (166.49 (109.24-247.20)), and STEMI (178.63 (111.18-305.92)) patients and controls (50.31 (44.30-69.78)) with significant incremental value from SA to STEMI. We observed a positive and significant correlation between serum-NGAL and hs-CRP (spearman coefficient rho = 0.685, P < 0.0001) as well as with neutrophil counts (r = 0.511, P < 0.0001). Conclusions. In patients with coronary artery disease serum levels of NGAL increase and reflect the degree of inflammatory process. In patients with acute coronary syndromes, serum levels of NGAL have high negative predictive value and reflecting the inflammatory status could show the severity of coronary clinical syndrome.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22988542 PMCID: PMC3440856 DOI: 10.1155/2012/189797
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Inflam ISSN: 2042-0099
Figure 1Flow diagram of subject recruitment. Ten patients were excluded for the following reasons: malignant diseases (n = 1), active infections (n = 3), and end stage renal disease (n = 3) recent surgery (n = 3). Also 20 patients with negative coronary angiography were excluded.
Patient demographics and clinical characteristics.
| Nr | Stable angina | Unstable angina | NSTEMI | STEMI | Control group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 40 | 35 | 40 | 25 | 20 | |
| Sex (male/female) | (31/9) | (27/8) | (33/7) | (20/5) | (16/4) |
| Age mean (SD) | 63.8 (9.85) | 64.6 (8.17) | 64.5 (9.96) | 64.2 (11.19) | 41.5 (7.96) |
| BMI mean (SD) | 29.76 (4.89) | 28.26 (4.81) | 28.65 (3.56) | 26.26 (2.12) | 23.58 (1.80) |
| Diabetes | 16 (40.00) | 14 (40.00) | 17 (42.50) | 12 (48.00) | 0 |
| Hypertension | 27 (65.71) | 25 (71.43) | 20 (70.00) | 19 (76.00) | 0 |
| Dyslipidemia | 27 (67.50) | 19 (57.15) | 25 (62.50) | 17 (68.00) | 0 |
| Smoking | 12 active 6 quit | 17 active 1quit | 18 active | 14 active 4 quit | 0 |
Median and range of serum, urine NGAL, hs-CRP serum creatinine, and eGFR(MDRD) among patient groups and healthy controls.
| Nr | Stable angina | Unstable Angina | NSTEMI | STEMI | Control group | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Units | 40 | 35 | 40 | 25 | 20 | |
| hs-CRP median ( | mg/dL | 0.40 (0.05–0.87) | 0.69 (0.11–3.69) | 1.17 (0.24–13.21) | 3.91 (0.31–13.62) | 0.12 (0.02–0.25) |
| WBC count, mean (SD) | (×103) | 7.67 (1.99) | 9.38 (2.32) | 11.50 (2.65) | 14.67 (4.92) | nd |
| Neutrophil count, mean (SD) | (×103) | 4.90 (1.72) | 6.44 (1.96) | 8.27 (2.44) | 11.08 (4.15) | nd |
| s-NGAL (∗) median ( | ng/mL | 79.23 (37.50–100.32) | 108.00 (68.34–177.59) | 166.49 (109.24–247.20) | 178.63 (111.18–305.92) | 50.31 (44.30–69.78) |
| s-Creatinine, mean (SD) |
| 79.72 (16.94) | 79.86 (17.78) | 86.04 (21.74) | 88.65 (34.46) | 81.26 (7.97) |
| eGFR(MDRD), mean (SD) | mL/min | 89.71 (19.85) | 89.63 (22.96) | 85.79 (22.20) | 81.75 (21.06) | 97.65 (19.55) |
(∗) P < 0.05 for the comparison between patients with SA and controls, P < 0.005 for the comparison between patients with SA with patients with UA, and P < 0.001 for the comparisons of rest groups, and P = NS for the comparison of patients with STEMI with NSTEMI.
Figure 2Box plots of median serum-NGAL values (ng/mL) among the 4 patients groups and healthy controls (y axis is in linear scale).
Figure 3Regression analysis between serum-NGAL and hs-CRP.
Figure 4Scater plots of PMN values versus serum NGAL.
Figure 5ROC curve analysis for CRP (green line), serum-NGAL (red line), and PMN count (blue line) for the discrimination of UA patients from patients with SA.
Figure 6ROC curve analysis for CRP (green line), serum-NGAL (red line), and PMN (blue line) for the discrimination of ACS patients from patients with SA.