Literature DB >> 22988040

Benefits and harms of detecting clinically occult breast cancer.

Eitan Amir1, Philippe L Bedard, Alberto Ocaña, Bostjan Seruga.   

Abstract

Over the last few decades there has been an increase in the use of strategies to detect clinically occult breast cancer with the aim of achieving diagnosis at an earlier stage when prognosis may be improved. Such strategies include screening mammography in healthy women, diagnostic imaging and axillary staging in those diagnosed with breast cancer, and the use of follow-up imaging for the early detection of recurrent or metastatic disease. Some of these strategies are established, whereas for others there are inconsistent supportive data. Although the potential benefit of early detection of clinically occult breast cancer seems intuitive, use of such strategies can also be associated with harm. In this commentary, we provide an extended discussion on the potential benefits and harms of the routine and frequent use of screening interventions to detect clinically occult breast cancer and question whether we may be causing more harm than good.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22988040     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djs394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  6 in total

1.  Were our estimates of overdiagnosis with mammography screening in the United States "based on faulty science"?

Authors:  Archie Bleyer
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-02

2.  Breast cancer screening: evidence of benefit depends on the method used.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Contralateral Breast Cancer Occurrence Among Older Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Jessica B Long; Brigid K Killelea; Suzanne B Evans; Kenneth B Roberts; Andrea Silber; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Pregnant Women's Perceptions of Harms and Benefits of Mental Health Screening.

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Marie-Paule Austin; Sheila W McDonald; Lydia Vermeyden; Maureen Heaman; Kathleen Hegadoren; Gerri Lasiuk; Joshua Kingston; Wendy Sword; Karly Jarema; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Sarah D McDonald; Anne Biringer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Personality and breast cancer screening in women of the GAZEL cohort study.

Authors:  Cédric Lemogne; Monica Turinici; Henri Panjo; Charlotte Ngo; Florence Canoui-Poitrine; Jean-Christophe Chauvet-Gelinier; Frédéric Limosin; Silla M Consoli; Marcel Goldberg; Marie Zins; Virginie Ringa
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Using relative survival measures for cross-sectional and longitudinal benchmarks of countries, states, and districts: the BenchRelSurv- and BenchRelSurvPlot-macros.

Authors:  Christian O Jacke; Iris Reinhard; Ute S Albert
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.