Literature DB >> 22987461

Lower risk of decompression sickness after recommendation of conservative decompression practices in divers with and without vascular right-to-left shunt.

Christoph Klingmann1, Nils Rathmann, Daniel Hausmann, Thomas Bruckner, Rolf Kern.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A vascular right-to-left shunt (r/l shunt) is a well-known risk factor for the development of decompression sickness (DCS). No studies to date have examined whether divers with a history of DCS with or without a r/l shunt have a reduced risk of suffering recurrent DCS when diving more conservative dive profiles (CDP).
METHODS: Twenty-seven divers with a history of DCS recommended previously to dive more conservatively were included in this study and retrospectively interviewed by phone to determine the incidence of DCS recurrence.
RESULTS: Twenty-seven divers performed 17,851 dives before examination in our department and 9,236 after recommendations for conservative diving. Mean follow up was 5.3 years (range 0-11 years). Thirty-eight events of DCS occurred in total, 34 before and four after recommendation of CDP. Four divers had a closure of their patent foramen ovale (PFO). A highly significant reduction of DCS risk was observed after recommendation of CDP for the whole group as well as for the sub-groups with or without a r/l shunt. A significant reduction of DCS risk in respect to r/l shunt size was also observed. DISCUSSION: This study indicates that recommendations to reduce nitrogen load after DCS appear to reduce the risk of developing subsequent DCS. This finding is independent of whether the divers have a r/l shunt or of shunt size. The risk of suffering recurrent DCS after recommendation for CDP is less than or equal to an unselected cohort of divers.
CONCLUSION: Recommendation for CDP seems to significantly reduce the risk of recurrent DCS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22987461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med        ISSN: 1833-3516            Impact factor:   0.887


  7 in total

1.  The effectiveness of risk mitigation interventions in divers with persistent (patent) foramen ovale.

Authors:  George Anderson; Douglas Ebersole; Derek Covington; Petar J Denoble
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 0.887

Review 2.  The management of patent foramen ovale in divers: where do we stand?

Authors:  Anastasios Apostolos; Maria Drakopoulou; George Trantalis; Αndreas Synetos; George Oikonomou; Theodoros Karapanayiotides; Costas Tsioufis; Konstantinos Toutouzas
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 6.430

3.  Does persistent (patent) foramen ovale closure reduce the risk of recurrent decompression sickness in scuba divers?

Authors:  Björn Edvinsson; Ulf Thilén; Niels Erik Nielsen; Christina Christersson; Mikael Dellborg; Peter Eriksson; Joanna Hlebowicz
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 0.887

4.  Decompression sickness after a highly conservative dive in a diver with known persistent foramen ovale: Case report.

Authors:  William Brampton; Martin Dj Sayer
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 0.887

Review 5.  A review of diving practices and outcomes following the diagnosis of a persistent (patent) foramen ovale in compressed air divers with a documented episode of decompression sickness.

Authors:  Christopher W Scarff; John Lippmann; Andrew Fock
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2020-12-20       Impact factor: 0.887

6.  Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO), Personality Traits, and Iterative Decompression Sickness. Retrospective Analysis of 209 Cases.

Authors:  Pierre Lafère; Costantino Balestra; Dirk Caers; Peter Germonpré
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-02

7.  Persistent foramen ovale closure in divers with a history of decompression sickness.

Authors:  R Koopsen; P R Stella; K M Thijs; R Rienks
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.380

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.