BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization has a standardized tool to assess surgical capacity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), but it is often resource- and time-intensive. There currently exists no simple, evidence-based measure of surgical capacity in these settings. The proportion of cesarean deliveries in regard to the total operations (C/O ratio) has been suggested as a way to assess quickly the capacity for emergency and essential surgery in LMICs. This ratio has been estimated to be between 23.3 and 41.5 % in LMICs, but the tool's utility has not been replicated. METHODS: We reviewed operative logbooks for the Partners In Health/Zanmi Lasante hospital in Cange, Haiti. We recorded data on all consecutive surgical patients from July 2008 to 2010 and calculated the C/O ratio by dividing the number of cesarean deliveries by the total number of operations performed. We also analyzed surgical data by surgeon nationality to provide additional information about local surgical capacity. RESULTS: A total of 3,641 operations were performed between 2008 and 2010. The C/O ratio decreased significantly between 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 (13.4 vs. 10.7 %, p = 0.001) as the surgical volume and resources increased. Nationality analysis demonstrated that Haitian surgeons were able to provide a spectrum of general and specialist surgical care. CONCLUSIONS: In its inherent relation to essential surgical procedures and to the overall rate of cesarean deliveries in the region, the C/O ratio can provide an accessible assessment of regional surgical resources. In Haiti, the change in the C/O ratio demonstrated a relative increase in surgical capacity from 2008 to 2010. An additional analysis of surgeon nationality ensured that C/O ratio estimates more accurately reflect local practitioner activity, but deficiencies in the regional capacity to address the local burden of surgical disease may still exist.
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization has a standardized tool to assess surgical capacity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), but it is often resource- and time-intensive. There currently exists no simple, evidence-based measure of surgical capacity in these settings. The proportion of cesarean deliveries in regard to the total operations (C/O ratio) has been suggested as a way to assess quickly the capacity for emergency and essential surgery in LMICs. This ratio has been estimated to be between 23.3 and 41.5 % in LMICs, but the tool's utility has not been replicated. METHODS: We reviewed operative logbooks for the Partners In Health/Zanmi Lasante hospital in Cange, Haiti. We recorded data on all consecutive surgical patients from July 2008 to 2010 and calculated the C/O ratio by dividing the number of cesarean deliveries by the total number of operations performed. We also analyzed surgical data by surgeon nationality to provide additional information about local surgical capacity. RESULTS: A total of 3,641 operations were performed between 2008 and 2010. The C/O ratio decreased significantly between 2008-2009 and 2009-2010 (13.4 vs. 10.7 %, p = 0.001) as the surgical volume and resources increased. Nationality analysis demonstrated that Haitian surgeons were able to provide a spectrum of general and specialist surgical care. CONCLUSIONS: In its inherent relation to essential surgical procedures and to the overall rate of cesarean deliveries in the region, the C/O ratio can provide an accessible assessment of regional surgical resources. In Haiti, the change in the C/O ratio demonstrated a relative increase in surgical capacity from 2008 to 2010. An additional analysis of surgeon nationality ensured that C/O ratio estimates more accurately reflect local practitioner activity, but deficiencies in the regional capacity to address the local burden of surgical disease may still exist.
Authors: Steve Kwon; T Peter Kingham; Thaim B Kamara; Lawrence Sherman; Eileen Natuzzi; Charles Mock; Adam Kushner Journal: World J Surg Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Eileen S Natuzzi; Adam Kushner; Rooney Jagilly; Douglas Pickacha; Kaeni Agiomea; Levi Hou; Patrick Houasia; Phillip L Hendricks; Dudley Ba'erodo Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Lawrence Sherman; Peter T Clement; Meena N Cherian; Nestor Ndayimirije; Luc Noel; Bernice Dahn; Walter T Gwenigale; Adam L Kushner Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2011-01
Authors: Thomas McIntyre; Christopher D Hughes; Thierry Pauyo; Stephen R Sullivan; Selwyn O Rogers; Maxi Raymonville; John G Meara Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Hayley Osen; David Chang; Shelly Choo; Henry Perry; Afua Hesse; Francis Abantanga; Colin McCord; Kristin Chrouser; Fizan Abdullah Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Lucas C Carlson; Barclay T Stewart; Kristin W Hatcher; Charles Kabetu; Richard VanderBurg; William P Magee Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Jonathan C Samuel; Anna F Tyson; Charles Mabedi; Gift Mulima; Bruce A Cairns; Carlos Varela; Anthony G Charles Journal: Int J Surg Date: 2014-07-29 Impact factor: 6.071
Authors: Adam Gyedu; Lynette Lester; Barclay Stewart; Kwabena A Danso; Emmanuella L Salia; Robert Quansah; Peter Donkor; Charles Mock Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Thomas G Weiser; Alex B Haynes; George Molina; Stuart R Lipsitz; Micaela M Esquivel; Tarsicio Uribe-Leitz; Rui Fu; Tej Azad; Tiffany E Chao; William R Berry; Atul A Gawande Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Katherine Albutt; Maria Punchak; Peter Kayima; Didacus B Namanya; Mark G Shrime Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 2.655