BACKGROUND: Anatomic diversity among cerebellar arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) calls for a classification that is intuitive and surgically informative. Selection tools like the Spetzler-Martin grading system are designed to work best with cerebral AVMs but have shortcomings with cerebellar AVMs. OBJECTIVE: To define subtypes of cerebellar AVMs that clarify anatomy and surgical management, to determine results according to subtypes, and to compare predictive accuracies of the Spetzler-Martin and supplementary systems. METHODS: From a consecutive surgical series of 500 patients, 60 had cerebellar AVMs, 39 had brainstem AVMs and were excluded, and 401 had cerebral AVMs. RESULTS: Cerebellar AVM subtypes were as follows: 18 vermian, 13 suboccipital, 12 tentorial, 12 petrosal, and 5 tonsillar. Patients with tonsillar and tentorial AVMs fared best. Cerebellar AVMs presented with hemorrhage more than cerebral AVMs (P < .001). Cerebellar AVMs were more likely to drain deep (P = .04) and less likely to be eloquent (P < .001). The predictive accuracy of the supplementary grade was better than that of the Spetzler-Martin grade with cerebellar AVMs (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.74 and 0.59, respectively). The predictive accuracy of the supplementary system was consistent for cerebral and cerebellar AVMs, whereas that of the Spetzler-Martin system was greater with cerebral AVMs. CONCLUSION: Patients with cerebellar AVMs present with hemorrhage more often than patients with cerebral AVMs, justifying an aggressive treatment posture. The supplementary system is better than the Spetzler-Martin system at predicting outcomes after cerebellar AVM resection. Key components of the Spetzler-Martin system such as venous drainage and eloquence are distorted by cerebellar anatomy in ways that components of the supplementary system are not.
BACKGROUND: Anatomic diversity among cerebellar arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) calls for a classification that is intuitive and surgically informative. Selection tools like the Spetzler-Martin grading system are designed to work best with cerebral AVMs but have shortcomings with cerebellar AVMs. OBJECTIVE: To define subtypes of cerebellar AVMs that clarify anatomy and surgical management, to determine results according to subtypes, and to compare predictive accuracies of the Spetzler-Martin and supplementary systems. METHODS: From a consecutive surgical series of 500 patients, 60 had cerebellar AVMs, 39 had brainstem AVMs and were excluded, and 401 had cerebral AVMs. RESULTS: Cerebellar AVM subtypes were as follows: 18 vermian, 13 suboccipital, 12 tentorial, 12 petrosal, and 5 tonsillar. Patients with tonsillar and tentorial AVMs fared best. Cerebellar AVMs presented with hemorrhage more than cerebral AVMs (P < .001). Cerebellar AVMs were more likely to drain deep (P = .04) and less likely to be eloquent (P < .001). The predictive accuracy of the supplementary grade was better than that of the Spetzler-Martin grade with cerebellar AVMs (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.74 and 0.59, respectively). The predictive accuracy of the supplementary system was consistent for cerebral and cerebellar AVMs, whereas that of the Spetzler-Martin system was greater with cerebral AVMs. CONCLUSION:Patients with cerebellar AVMs present with hemorrhage more often than patients with cerebral AVMs, justifying an aggressive treatment posture. The supplementary system is better than the Spetzler-Martin system at predicting outcomes after cerebellar AVM resection. Key components of the Spetzler-Martin system such as venous drainage and eloquence are distorted by cerebellar anatomy in ways that components of the supplementary system are not.
Authors: C Stapf; H Mast; R R Sciacca; J H Choi; A V Khaw; E S Connolly; J Pile-Spellman; J P Mohr Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-05-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Michael T Lawton; Rose Du; Mary Nelson Tran; Achal S Achrol; Charles E McCulloch; S Claiborne Johnston; Nancy J Quinnine; William L Young Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: René O Sanchez-Mejia; Sravana K Chennupati; Nalin Gupta; Heather Fullerton; William L Young; Michael T Lawton Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: F Muñoz; P Clavel; J Molet; C Castaño; S de Teresa; J Solivera; C de Quintana; P Tresserras; R Rodríguez; F Bartumeus Journal: Neurocirugia (Astur) Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 0.553
Authors: Peyton L Nisson; Salman A Fard; Christina M Walter; Cameron M Johnstone; Michael A Mooney; Ali Tayebi Meybodi; Michael Lang; Helen Kim; Heidi Jahnke; Denise J Roe; Travis M Dumont; G Michael Lemole; Robert F Spetzler; Michael T Lawton Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Matthew B Potts; Darryl Lau; Adib A Abla; Helen Kim; William L Young; Michael T Lawton Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Adib A Abla; Jeffrey Nelson; W Caleb Rutledge; William L Young; Helen Kim; Michael T Lawton Journal: Neurosurg Focus Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 4.047