Literature DB >> 22986581

Alu-Alu fusion sequences identified at junction sites of copy number amplified regions in cancer cell lines.

K Kitada1, S Aikawa, S Aida.   

Abstract

Alu elements are short, ∼300-bp stretches of DNA and are the most abundant repetitive elements in the human genome. A large number of chromosomal rearrangements mediated by Alu-Alu recombination have been reported in germline cells, but only a few in somatic cells. Cancer development is frequently accompanied by various chromosomal rearrangements including gene amplification. To explore an involvement of Alu-Alu fusion in gene amplification events, we determined 20 junction site sequences of 5 highly amplified regions in 4 cancer cell lines. The amplified regions exhibited a common copy number profile: a stair-like increase with multiple segments, which is implicated in the breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) cycle-mediated amplification. All of the sequences determined were characterized as head-to-head or tail-to-tail fusion of sequences separated by 1-5 kb in the genome sequence. Of these, 4 junction site sequences were identified as Alu-Alu fusions between inverted, paired Alu elements with relatively long overlapping sequences of 17, 21, 22, and 24 bp. Together with genome mapping data of Alu elements, these findings suggest that when breakages occur at or near inverted, paired Alu elements in the process of BFB cycle-mediated amplification, sequence homology of Alu elements is frequently used to repair the broken ends.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22986581     DOI: 10.1159/000342885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  6 in total

1.  A comparison of 100 human genes using an alu element-based instability model.

Authors:  George W Cook; Miriam K Konkel; Jerilyn A Walker; Matthew G Bourgeois; Mitchell L Fullerton; John T Fussell; Heath D Herbold; Mark A Batzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Lack of major genome instability in tumors of p53 null rats.

Authors:  Roel Hermsen; Pim Toonen; Ewart Kuijk; Sameh A Youssef; Raoul Kuiper; Sebastiaan van Heesch; Alain de Bruin; Edwin Cuppen; Marieke Simonis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Heavy Metal Exposure Influences Double Strand Break DNA Repair Outcomes.

Authors:  Maria E Morales; Rebecca S Derbes; Catherine M Ade; Jonathan C Ortego; Jeremy Stark; Prescott L Deininger; Astrid M Roy-Engel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Alteration of the exDNA profile in blood serum of LLC-bearing mice under the decrease of tumour invasion potential by bovine pancreatic DNase I treatment.

Authors:  Ludmila A Alekseeva; Nadezhda L Mironova; Evgenyi V Brenner; Alexander M Kurilshikov; Olga A Patutina; Marina A Zenkova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Chimeric chromosome landscapes of human somatic cell cultures show dependence on stress and regulation of genomic repeats by CGGBP1.

Authors:  Subhamoy Datta; Manthan Patel; Sukesh Kashyap; Divyesh Patel; Umashankar Singh
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2022-01-17

6.  Structural variation and its potential impact on genome instability: Novel discoveries in the EGFR landscape by long-read sequencing.

Authors:  George W Cook; Michael G Benton; Wallace Akerley; George F Mayhew; Cynthia Moehlenkamp; Denise Raterman; Daniel L Burgess; William J Rowell; Christine Lambert; Kevin Eng; Jenny Gu; Primo Baybayan; John T Fussell; Heath D Herbold; John M O'Shea; Thomas K Varghese; Lyska L Emerson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.