Literature DB >> 22986320

Anesthetic considerations for robotic prostatectomy: a review of the literature.

Hamdy Awad1, Christian M Walker, Mohammed Shaikh, Galina T Dimitrova, Ronney Abaza, Jerome O'Hara.   

Abstract

Since the first robotic prostatectomy in 2000, the number of prostatectomies performed using robot-assisted laparoscopy has been increasing. As of 2009, 90,000 robotic radical prostatectomies were performed worldwide, and 80% of all radical prostatectomies performed in the United States were performed robotically. Robotic prostatectomy is becoming more common globally because of the many advantages offered to patients, primarily due to the minimally invasive nature of the procedure. Several new perioperative concerns and challenges for anesthesiologists and are described.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22986320     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  19 in total

1.  Getting smarter with patient positioning.

Authors:  L R Kidd; T Deen
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-03-26

2.  Corneal abrasion in hysterectomy and prostatectomy: role of laparoscopic and robotic assistance.

Authors:  Ajay Sampat; Isaac Parakati; Rangesh Kunnavakkam; David B Glick; Nita K Lee; Meaghan Tenney; Scott Eggener; Steven Roth
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Impact of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on the management of general anesthesia: efficacy of blood withdrawal during a steep Trendelenburg position.

Authors:  Junichi Saito; Satoko Noguchi; Anna Matsumoto; Kei Jinushi; Toshinori Kasai; Tomoyuki Kudo; Masahiro Sawada; Futoshi Kimura; Tetsuya Kushikata; Kazuyoshi Hirota
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  Total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for adults undergoing transabdominal robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Suzanne Forsyth Herling; Bjørn Dreijer; Gitte Wrist Lam; Thordis Thomsen; Ann Merete Møller
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-04

5.  Are you seeing this: the impact of steep Trendelenburg position during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on intraocular pressure: a brief review of the literature.

Authors:  Robert S Ackerman; Jonathan B Cohen; Rosemarie E Garcia Getting; Sephalie Y Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-07-25

6.  Comparing the effect of positioning on cerebral autoregulation during radical prostatectomy: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Stefanie Beck; Haissam Ragab; Dennis Hoop; Aurélie Meßner-Schmitt; Cornelius Rademacher; Ursula Kahl; Franziska von Breunig; Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Christian Zöllner; Marlene Fischer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Transient but significant visual field defects after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in deep tRendelenburg position.

Authors:  Yukako Taketani; Chihiro Mayama; Noriyuki Suzuki; Akiko Wada; Tatsuhiro Oka; Kazuya Inamochi; Yohei Nomoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Feasibility of dexmedetomidine as sole analgesic agent during robotic urological surgery: A pilot study.

Authors:  Bright Jebaraj; Rashmi Ramachandran; Vimi Rewari; Anjan Trikha; Rajeev Kumar; Prem Nath Dogra
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

9.  Unexpected hemorrhage during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a case report.

Authors:  Shoko Nakano; Junko Nakahira; Toshiyuki Sawai; Noriko Kadono; Toshiaki Minami
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2016-08-30

10.  Diaphragm Thickening Fraction as a Prognostic Imaging Marker for Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Requiring the Trendelenburg Position and Pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  Jihion Yu; Yongsoo Lee; Jun-Young Park; Jai-Hyun Hwang; Young-Kug Kim
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.434

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.