OBJECTIVES: Past research has largely neglected to investigate mild adverse effects (MAEs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), including headache and nausea. Here we explored the relationship between MAEs, participant characteristics (age and gender) and protocol parameters, including mode of application, coil geometry, stimulated brain region, TMS frequency, TMS intensity, and active vs. sham stimulation. METHODS: Data from 1270 standard post-monitoring forms was obtained from 113 healthy participants. Analyses aimed to identify the risk factors associated with MAE reports and specific symptoms. RESULTS: The overall rate of MAEs across TMS sessions was ∼5%, with ∼78% of symptoms occurring post-session. Initial TMS sessions were followed by a higher MAE incidence rate relative to later testing sessions. No associations between participant characteristics, TMS frequency, or intensity were observed. CONCLUSIONS: TMS-related MAEs are relatively common and may be exacerbated by initial expectations or anxieties of participants. A significant proportion of MAEs may reflect reporting of coincidental phenomena that are unrelated to TMS. Recommendations for future safety studies are proposed and monitoring documentation is provided. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings illustrate the importance of standardized monitoring of MAEs. Such research aids our understanding of how MAEs arise and may lead to interventions for reducing their incidence.
OBJECTIVES: Past research has largely neglected to investigate mild adverse effects (MAEs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), including headache and nausea. Here we explored the relationship between MAEs, participant characteristics (age and gender) and protocol parameters, including mode of application, coil geometry, stimulated brain region, TMS frequency, TMS intensity, and active vs. sham stimulation. METHODS: Data from 1270 standard post-monitoring forms was obtained from 113 healthy participants. Analyses aimed to identify the risk factors associated with MAE reports and specific symptoms. RESULTS: The overall rate of MAEs across TMS sessions was ∼5%, with ∼78% of symptoms occurring post-session. Initial TMS sessions were followed by a higher MAE incidence rate relative to later testing sessions. No associations between participant characteristics, TMS frequency, or intensity were observed. CONCLUSIONS: TMS-related MAEs are relatively common and may be exacerbated by initial expectations or anxieties of participants. A significant proportion of MAEs may reflect reporting of coincidental phenomena that are unrelated to TMS. Recommendations for future safety studies are proposed and monitoring documentation is provided. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings illustrate the importance of standardized monitoring of MAEs. Such research aids our understanding of how MAEs arise and may lead to interventions for reducing their incidence.
Authors: Bernadette T Gillick; Linda E Krach; Tim Feyma; Tonya L Rich; Kelli Moberg; Jeremiah Menk; Jessica Cassidy; Teresa Kimberley; James R Carey Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2014-10-02 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Christopher P G Allen; Benjamin T Dunkley; Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy; Richard Edden; C John Evans; Petroc Sumner; Krish D Singh; Christopher D Chambers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yaejee H Hong; Steve W Wu; Ernest V Pedapati; Paul S Horn; David A Huddleston; Cameron S Laue; Donald L Gilbert Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2015-02-04 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Hatem S Shehata; Eman H Esmail; Ahmad Abdelalim; Shaimaa El-Jaafary; Alaa Elmazny; Asmaa Sabbah; Nevin M Shalaby Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: Ernest V Pedapati; Donald L Gilbert; Paul S Horn; David A Huddleston; Cameron S Laue; Nasrin Shahana; Steve W Wu Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Max M Klein; Roi Treister; Tommi Raij; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Lawrence Park; Turo Nurmikko; Fred Lenz; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Magdalena Lang; Mark Hallett; Michael Fox; Merit Cudkowicz; Ann Costello; Daniel B Carr; Samar S Ayache; Anne Louise Oaklander Journal: Pain Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Serena Fiocchi; Michela Longhi; Paolo Ravazzani; Yiftach Roth; Abraham Zangen; Marta Parazzini Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 2.238