Literature DB >> 22986284

Comparative incidence rates of mild adverse effects to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Leah Maizey1, Christopher P G Allen, Martynas Dervinis, Frederick Verbruggen, Alice Varnava, Michail Kozlov, Rachel C Adams, Mark Stokes, Jane Klemen, Andreas Bungert, Charles A Hounsell, Christopher D Chambers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Past research has largely neglected to investigate mild adverse effects (MAEs) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), including headache and nausea. Here we explored the relationship between MAEs, participant characteristics (age and gender) and protocol parameters, including mode of application, coil geometry, stimulated brain region, TMS frequency, TMS intensity, and active vs. sham stimulation.
METHODS: Data from 1270 standard post-monitoring forms was obtained from 113 healthy participants. Analyses aimed to identify the risk factors associated with MAE reports and specific symptoms.
RESULTS: The overall rate of MAEs across TMS sessions was ∼5%, with ∼78% of symptoms occurring post-session. Initial TMS sessions were followed by a higher MAE incidence rate relative to later testing sessions. No associations between participant characteristics, TMS frequency, or intensity were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: TMS-related MAEs are relatively common and may be exacerbated by initial expectations or anxieties of participants. A significant proportion of MAEs may reflect reporting of coincidental phenomena that are unrelated to TMS. Recommendations for future safety studies are proposed and monitoring documentation is provided. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings illustrate the importance of standardized monitoring of MAEs. Such research aids our understanding of how MAEs arise and may lead to interventions for reducing their incidence.
Copyright © 2012 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22986284     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2012.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  21 in total

1.  Understanding factors contributing to participant satisfaction in stroke walking recovery clinical trials.

Authors:  Mark Cummings; Sonia Pradhan; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2022-06-11

2.  Safety of primed repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and modified constraint-induced movement therapy in a randomized controlled trial in pediatric hemiparesis.

Authors:  Bernadette T Gillick; Linda E Krach; Tim Feyma; Tonya L Rich; Kelli Moberg; Jeremiah Menk; Jessica Cassidy; Teresa Kimberley; James R Carey
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Enhanced awareness followed reversible inhibition of human visual cortex: a combined TMS, MRS and MEG study.

Authors:  Christopher P G Allen; Benjamin T Dunkley; Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy; Richard Edden; C John Evans; Petroc Sumner; Krish D Singh; Christopher D Chambers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Safety and tolerability of theta burst stimulation vs. single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: a comparative study of 165 pediatric subjects.

Authors:  Yaejee H Hong; Steve W Wu; Ernest V Pedapati; Paul S Horn; David A Huddleston; Cameron S Laue; Donald L Gilbert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Magnetic suppression of perceptual accuracy is not reduced in episodic migraine without aura.

Authors:  Veronika Rauschel; Ruth Ruscheweyh; Thomas Eggert; Andreas Straube
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 7.277

6.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus botulinum toxin injection in chronic migraine prophylaxis: a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Hatem S Shehata; Eman H Esmail; Ahmad Abdelalim; Shaimaa El-Jaafary; Alaa Elmazny; Asmaa Sabbah; Nevin M Shalaby
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.133

7.  Successful use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in difficult to treat hypersexual disorder.

Authors:  Adarsh Tripathi; Amit Singh; Harpreet Singh; Sujita Kumar Kar
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

8.  Effect of 30 Hz theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation on the primary motor cortex in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Ernest V Pedapati; Donald L Gilbert; Paul S Horn; David A Huddleston; Cameron S Laue; Nasrin Shahana; Steve W Wu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: guidelines for pain treatment research.

Authors:  Max M Klein; Roi Treister; Tommi Raij; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Lawrence Park; Turo Nurmikko; Fred Lenz; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur; Magdalena Lang; Mark Hallett; Michael Fox; Merit Cudkowicz; Ann Costello; Daniel B Carr; Samar S Ayache; Anne Louise Oaklander
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 7.926

10.  Modelling of the Electric Field Distribution in Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Adolescence, in the Adulthood, and in the Old Age.

Authors:  Serena Fiocchi; Michela Longhi; Paolo Ravazzani; Yiftach Roth; Abraham Zangen; Marta Parazzini
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.