Literature DB >> 22986212

Total mesophilic counts underestimate in many cases the contamination levels of psychrotrophic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in chilled-stored food products at the end of their shelf-life.

Vasileios Pothakos1, Simbarashe Samapundo, Frank Devlieghere.   

Abstract

The major objective of this study was to determine the role of psychrotrophic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in spoilage-associated phenomena at the end of the shelf-life of 86 various packaged (air, vacuum, modified-atmosphere) chilled-stored retail food products. The current microbiological standards, which are largely based on the total viable mesophilic counts lack discriminatory capacity to detect psychrotrophic LAB. A comparison between the total viable counts on plates incubated at 30 °C (representing the mesophiles) and at 22 °C (indicating the psychrotrophs) for 86 food samples covering a wide range - ready-to-eat vegetable salads, fresh raw meat, cooked meat products and composite food - showed that a consistent underestimation of the microbial load occurs when the total aerobic mesophilic counts are used as a shelf-life parameter. In 38% of the samples, the psychrotrophic counts had significantly higher values (+0.5-3 log CFU/g) than the corresponding total aerobic mesophilic counts. A total of 154 lactic acid bacteria, which were unable to proliferate at 30 °C were isolated. In addition, a further 43 with a poor recovery at this temperature were also isolated. This study highlights the potential fallacy of the total aerobic mesophilic count as a reference shelf-life parameter for chilled food products as it can often underestimate the contamination levels at the end of the shelf-life.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22986212     DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0740-0020            Impact factor:   5.516


  6 in total

1.  Microbiological contamination of dried and lyophilized garlic as a potential source of food spoilage.

Authors:  Lucyna Kłębukowska; Anna Zadernowska; Wioleta Chajęcka-Wierzchowska
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.701

2.  Evaluation of anti-oxidant and anti-microbial activity of various essential oils in fresh chicken sausages.

Authors:  Heena Sharma; S K Mendiratta; Ravi Kant Agarwal; Sudheer Kumar; Arvind Soni
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  Spoilage Bacteria Counts on Broiler Meat at Different Stages of Commercial Poultry Processing Plants That Use Peracetic Acid.

Authors:  Hudson T Thames; Courtney A Fancher; Mary G Colvin; Mika McAnally; Emily Tucker; Li Zhang; Aaron S Kiess; Thu T N Dinh; Anuraj T Sukumaran
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Processing Environment and Ingredients Are Both Sources of Leuconostoc gelidum, Which Emerges as a Major Spoiler in Ready-To-Eat Meals.

Authors:  Vasileios Pothakos; Giuseppina Stellato; Danilo Ercolini; Frank Devlieghere
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Influence of polyamide composite casings with silver-zinc crystals on the quality of beef and chicken sausages during their storage.

Authors:  Jairo H Patiño; Luis E Henríquez; Diego A Restrepo; María I Lantero; Mario A García
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 2.701

6.  The Pork Meat or the Environment of the Production Facility? The Effect of Individual Technological Steps on the Bacterial Contamination in Cooked Hams.

Authors:  Helena Veselá; Kateřina Dorotíková; Marta Dušková; Petra Furmančíková; Ondrej Šedo; Josef Kameník
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.