Literature DB >> 22986077

Disentangling common and specific neural subprocesses of response inhibition.

A Sebastian1, M F Pohl, S Klöppel, B Feige, T Lange, C Stahl, A Voss, K C Klauer, K Lieb, O Tüscher.   

Abstract

Response inhibition is disturbed in several disorders sharing impulse control deficits as a core symptom. Since response inhibition is a cognitively and neurally multifaceted function which has been shown to rely on differing neural subprocesses and neurotransmitter systems, further differentiation to define neurophysiological endophenotypes is essential. Response inhibition may involve at least three separable cognitive subcomponents, i.e. interference inhibition, action withholding, and action cancelation. Here, we introduce a novel paradigm - the Hybrid Response Inhibition task - to disentangle interference inhibition, action withholding and action cancelation and their neural subprocesses within one task setting during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). To validate the novel task, results were compared to a battery of separate, standard response inhibition tasks independently capturing these subcomponents and subprocesses. Across all subcomponents, mutual activation was present in the right inferior frontal cortex (rIFC), pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) and parietal regions. Interference inhibition revealed stronger activation in pre-motor and parietal regions. Action cancelation resulted in stronger activation in fronto-striatal regions. Our results show that all subcomponents share a common neural network and thus all constitute different subprocesses of response inhibition. Subprocesses, however, differ to the degree of regional involvement: interference inhibition relies more pronouncedly on a fronto-parietal-pre-motor network suggesting its close relation to response selection processes. Action cancelation, in turn, is more strongly associated with the fronto-striatal pathway implicating it as a late subcomponent of response inhibition. The new paradigm reliably captures three putatively subsequent subprocesses of response inhibition and might be a promising tool to differentially assess disturbed neural networks in disorders showing impulse control deficits.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22986077     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  53 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current brain stimulation decreases impulsivity in ADHD.

Authors:  Cheyenne Allenby; Mary Falcone; Leah Bernardo; E Paul Wileyto; Anthony Rostain; J Russell Ramsay; Caryn Lerman; James Loughead
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Impulsivity and Aggression in Female BPD and ADHD Patients: Association with ACC Glutamate and GABA Concentrations.

Authors:  Gabriele Ende; Sylvia Cackowski; Julia Van Eijk; Markus Sack; Traute Demirakca; Nikolaus Kleindienst; Martin Bohus; Esther Sobanski; Annegret Krause-Utz; Christian Schmahl
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Surprise: Unexpected Action Execution and Unexpected Inhibition Recruit the Same Fronto-Basal-Ganglia Network.

Authors:  Alexandra Sebastian; Anne Maria Konken; Michael Schaum; Klaus Lieb; Oliver Tüscher; Patrick Jung
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Dissociable attentional and inhibitory networks of dorsal and ventral areas of the right inferior frontal cortex: a combined task-specific and coordinate-based meta-analytic fMRI study.

Authors:  Alexandra Sebastian; Patrick Jung; Jonathan Neuhoff; Michael Wibral; Peter T Fox; Klaus Lieb; Pascal Fries; Simon B Eickhoff; Oliver Tüscher; Arian Mobascher
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.270

5.  Analyzing distributional properties of interference effects across modalities: chances and challenges.

Authors:  Kerstin Dittrich; David Kellen; Christoph Stahl
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-14

6.  Data-driven analysis of simultaneous EEG/fMRI reveals neurophysiological phenotypes of impulse control.

Authors:  Lena Schmüser; Alexandra Sebastian; Arian Mobascher; Klaus Lieb; Bernd Feige; Oliver Tüscher
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  A Lifespan Model of Interference Resolution and Inhibitory Control: Risk for Depression and Changes with Illness Progression.

Authors:  Katie L Bessette; Aimee J Karstens; Natania A Crane; Amy T Peters; Jonathan P Stange; Kathleen H Elverman; Sarah Shizuko Morimoto; Sara L Weisenbach; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 7.444

8.  Sensitivity to perception level differentiates two subnetworks within the mirror neuron system.

Authors:  Shiri Simon; Roy Mukamel
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Dissociations of cognitive inhibition, response inhibition, and emotional interference: Voxelwise ALE meta-analyses of fMRI studies.

Authors:  Yuwen Hung; Schuyler L Gaillard; Pavel Yarmak; Marie Arsalidou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  Three key regions for supervisory attentional control: evidence from neuroimaging meta-analyses.

Authors:  Edna C Cieslik; Veronika I Mueller; Claudia R Eickhoff; Robert Langner; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.