Literature DB >> 22985185

A strategy for large-scale phosphoproteomics and SRM-based validation of human breast cancer tissue samples.

Ryohei Narumi1, Tatsuo Murakami, Takahisa Kuga, Jun Adachi, Takashi Shiromizu, Satoshi Muraoka, Hideaki Kume, Yoshio Kodera, Masaki Matsumoto, Keiichi Nakayama, Yasuhide Miyamoto, Makoto Ishitobi, Hideo Inaji, Kikuya Kato, Takeshi Tomonaga.   

Abstract

Protein phosphorylation is a key mechanism of cellular signaling pathways and aberrant phosphorylation has been implicated in a number of human diseases. Thus, approaches in phosphoproteomics can contribute to the identification of key biomarkers to assess disease pathogenesis and drug targets. Moreover, careful validation of large-scale phosphoproteome analysis, which is lacking in the current protein-based biomarker discovery, significantly increases the value of identified biomarkers. Here, we performed large-scale differential phosphoproteome analysis using IMAC coupled with the isobaric tag for relative quantification (iTRAQ) technique and subsequent validation by selected/multiple reaction monitoring (SRM/MRM) of human breast cancer tissues in high- and low-risk recurrence groups. We identified 8309 phosphorylation sites on 3401 proteins, of which 3766 phosphopeptides (1927 phosphoproteins) were able to be quantified and 133 phosphopeptides (117 phosphoproteins) were differentially expressed between the two groups. Among them, 19 phosphopeptides were selected for further verification and 15 were successfully quantified by SRM using stable isotope peptides as a reference. The ratio of phosphopeptides between high- and low-risk groups quantified by SRM was well correlated with iTRAQ-based quantification with a few exceptions. These results suggest that large-scale phosphoproteome quantification coupled with SRM-based validation is a powerful tool for biomarker discovery using clinical samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22985185     DOI: 10.1021/pr3005474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  36 in total

1.  Discovery of colorectal cancer biomarker candidates by membrane proteomic analysis and subsequent verification using selected reaction monitoring (SRM) and tissue microarray (TMA) analysis.

Authors:  Hideaki Kume; Satoshi Muraoka; Takahisa Kuga; Jun Adachi; Ryohei Narumi; Shio Watanabe; Masayoshi Kuwano; Yoshio Kodera; Kazuyuki Matsushita; Junya Fukuoka; Takeshi Masuda; Yasushi Ishihama; Hisahiro Matsubara; Fumio Nomura; Takeshi Tomonaga
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  The neddylation-cullin 2-RBX1 E3 ligase axis targets tumor suppressor RhoB for degradation in liver cancer.

Authors:  Junfeng Xu; Lihui Li; Guangyang Yu; Wantao Ying; Qiang Gao; Wenjuan Zhang; Xianyu Li; Chen Ding; Yanan Jiang; Dongping Wei; Shengzhong Duan; Qunying Lei; Peng Li; Tieliu Shi; Xiaohong Qian; Jun Qin; Lijun Jia
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Proteomics for cancer drug design.

Authors:  Amanda Haymond; Justin B Davis; Virginia Espina
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 3.940

4.  The tyrosine kinase v-Src causes mitotic slippage by phosphorylating an inhibitory tyrosine residue of Cdk1.

Authors:  Maria Horiuchi; Takahisa Kuga; Youhei Saito; Maiko Nagano; Jun Adachi; Takeshi Tomonaga; Naoto Yamaguchi; Yuji Nakayama
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Quantitative proteomics and phosphoproteomics on serial tumor biopsies from a sorafenib-treated HCC patient.

Authors:  Eva Dazert; Marco Colombi; Tujana Boldanova; Suzette Moes; David Adametz; Luca Quagliata; Volker Roth; Luigi Terracciano; Markus H Heim; Paul Jenoe; Michael N Hall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography Coupled to Multiple Reaction Monitoring Enables Reproducible Quantification of Phospho-signaling.

Authors:  Jacob J Kennedy; Ping Yan; Lei Zhao; Richard G Ivey; Uliana J Voytovich; Heather D Moore; Chenwei Lin; Era L Pogosova-Agadjanyan; Derek L Stirewalt; Kerryn W Reding; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Amanda G Paulovich
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  Rapid Phosphoproteomic Effects of Abscisic Acid (ABA) on Wild-Type and ABA Receptor-Deficient A. thaliana Mutants.

Authors:  Benjamin B Minkoff; Kelly E Stecker; Michael R Sussman
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Quantitative proteomics of breast tumors: Tissue quality assessment to clinical biomarkers.

Authors:  Yi Chen; David Britton; Elizabeth R Wood; Stephen Brantley; Anthony Magliocco; Ian Pike; John M Koomen
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 9.  Is phosphoproteomics ready for clinical research?

Authors:  Anton B Iliuk; W Andy Tao
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 10.  Analytical challenges translating mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics from discovery to clinical applications.

Authors:  Anton B Iliuk; Justine V Arrington; Weiguo Andy Tao
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.535

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.