BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Specialized stroke unit care improves outcome among patients with stroke, but it is unclear whether there are any scale advantages in costs and clinical outcome from treating a larger number of patients. We examined whether the case volume in stroke units was associated with quality of early stroke care, mortality, and hospital bed-day use. METHODS: In a nationwide population-based cohort study, we identified 63 995 patients admitted to stroke units in Denmark between 2003 and 2009. Data on exposure, outcome, and covariates were collected prospectively. Comparisons were clustered within stroke units and adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS: Patients in high-volume stroke units overall had a better prognostic profile than patients in low-volume stroke units. Patients in high-volume stroke units also received more processes of care in the early phase of stroke compared with patients in low-volume stroke units (unadjusted difference, 9.84 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.98-15.70). High stroke unit volume was associated with shorter length of the initial hospital stay (adjusted ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.41-0.59) and reduced bed-day use in the first year after stroke (adjusted ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.87). No association between volume and mortality was found. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted to high-volume stroke units received a higher quality of early stroke care and spent fewer days in the hospital compared with patients in low-volume units. We observed no association between volume and mortality.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Specialized stroke unit care improves outcome among patients with stroke, but it is unclear whether there are any scale advantages in costs and clinical outcome from treating a larger number of patients. We examined whether the case volume in stroke units was associated with quality of early stroke care, mortality, and hospital bed-day use. METHODS: In a nationwide population-based cohort study, we identified 63 995 patients admitted to stroke units in Denmark between 2003 and 2009. Data on exposure, outcome, and covariates were collected prospectively. Comparisons were clustered within stroke units and adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. RESULTS:Patients in high-volume stroke units overall had a better prognostic profile than patients in low-volume stroke units. Patients in high-volume stroke units also received more processes of care in the early phase of stroke compared with patients in low-volume stroke units (unadjusted difference, 9.84 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.98-15.70). High stroke unit volume was associated with shorter length of the initial hospital stay (adjusted ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.41-0.59) and reduced bed-day use in the first year after stroke (adjusted ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.87). No association between volume and mortality was found. CONCLUSIONS:Patients admitted to high-volume stroke units received a higher quality of early stroke care and spent fewer days in the hospital compared with patients in low-volume units. We observed no association between volume and mortality.
Authors: Eric E Adelman; Phillip A Scott; Lesli E Skolarus; Allison K Fox; Shirley M Frederiksen; William J Meurer Journal: J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2015-09-26 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Daniel T Lackland; Edward J Roccella; Anne F Deutsch; Myriam Fornage; Mary G George; George Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Lee H Schwamm; Eric E Smith; Amytis Towfighi Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: David C Lauzier; Maria M Galardi; Kristin P Guilliams; Manu S Goyal; Catherine Amlie-Lefond; Danial K Hallam; Akash P Kansagra Journal: Stroke Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Erika Frischknecht Christensen; Mette Dahl Bendtsen; Thomas Mulvad Larsen; Flemming Bøgh Jensen; Tim Alex Lindskou; Hans Ole Holdgaard; Poul Anders Hansen; Søren Paaske Johnsen; Christian Fynbo Christiansen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Steffi Hillmann; Silke Wiedmann; Viktoria Rücker; Klaus Berger; Darius Nabavi; Ingo Bruder; Hans-Christian Koennecke; Günter Seidel; Björn Misselwitz; Alfred Janssen; Christoph Burmeister; Christine Matthis; Otto Busse; Peter Hermanek; Peter Ulrich Heuschmann Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Sidsel Hastrup; Soren P Johnsen; Thorkild Terkelsen; Heidi H Hundborg; Paul von Weitzel-Mudersbach; Claus Z Simonsen; Niels Hjort; Anette T Møller; Thomas Harbo; Marika S Poulsen; Noella Ruiz de Morales Ayudarte; Dorte Damgaard; Grethe Andersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 9.910